PMID- 23581565
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20140630
LR  - 20131125
IS  - 1520-5118 (Electronic)
IS  - 0021-8561 (Linking)
VI  - 61
IP  - 16
DP  - 2013 Apr 24
TI  - Chemical profile, energy values, and protein molecular structure characteristics 
      of biofuel/bio-oil co-products (carinata meal) in comparison with canola meal.
PG  - 3926-33
LID - 10.1021/jf400028n [doi]
AB  - To our knowledge, little information exists on nutritive values and molecular 
      structural characteristics associated with protein biopolymers of carinata meal 
      from biofuel and bio-oil processing. The objectives of this study were to 
      investigate (1) chemical compositions; (2) protein and carbohydrate subfractions 
      partitioned by the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS); (3) truly 
      digestible nutrients and energy values; (4) protein conformation spectral 
      characteristics using the ATR-FT/IR technique; and (5) the correlation between 
      protein intrinsic structural features and nutrient profiles of carinata meal in 
      comparison with conventional canola meal as references. The results showed that 
      carinata meal was higher (p < 0.05) in soluble crude protein (SCP, 55.6% CP) and 
      nonprotein nitrogen (NPN, 38.5% CP) and lower in acid detergent insoluble crude 
      protein (ADICP, 1.3% CP) compared to canola meal. Although no differences were 
      found in CP and carbohydrate (CHO) contents, CNCPS protein and carbohydrate 
      subfractions were different (p < 0.05) between carinata meal and canola meal. 
      Carinata meal has similar contents of total digestible nutrient (TDN) and 
      predicted energy values to canoal meal (p > 0.05). As for protein spectral 
      features, much greater IR absorbance in amide I height and area as well as 
      alpha-helix and beta-sheet height for carinata meal by 20-31% (p < 0.05) was found 
      compared with canola meal; however, results from agglomerative hierarchical 
      cluster analysis (CLA) and principal component analysis (PCA) indicated these two 
      meals could not be distinguished completely within the protein spectrum (ca. 
      1728-1478 cm(-1)). Additionally, close correlations were observed between protein 
      structural parameters and protein nutrient profiles and subfractions. All the 
      comparisons between carinata meal and canola meal in our study indicated that 
      carinata meal could be used as a potential high-protein supplement source for 
      ruminants. Further study is needed on more information associated with nutrient 
      degradability, utilization, and availability of carinata meal to ruminants for 
      its better and effective application in animal industry.
FAU - Xin, Hangshu
AU  - Xin H
AD  - Department of Animal and Poultry Science, College of Agricultural and 
      Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan , 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 
      5A8, Canada.
FAU - Yu, Peiqiang
AU  - Yu P
LA  - eng
PT  - Comparative Study
PT  - Journal Article
PT  - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
DEP - 20130415
PL  - United States
TA  - J Agric Food Chem
JT  - Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
JID - 0374755
RN  - 0 (Biofuels)
RN  - 0 (Carbohydrates)
RN  - 0 (Dietary Proteins)
RN  - 0 (Plant Proteins)
SB  - IM
MH  - Animal Feed
MH  - Animals
MH  - Biofuels/*analysis
MH  - Brassica/*chemistry
MH  - Brassica rapa/*chemistry
MH  - Carbohydrates/analysis
MH  - Dietary Proteins
MH  - Energy Intake
MH  - Molecular Structure
MH  - Plant Proteins/*analysis/*chemistry
MH  - Protein Conformation
EDAT- 2013/04/16 06:00
MHDA- 2014/07/01 06:00
CRDT- 2013/04/16 06:00
PHST- 2013/04/16 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2013/04/16 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2014/07/01 06:00 [medline]
AID - 10.1021/jf400028n [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Apr 24;61(16):3926-33. doi: 10.1021/jf400028n. Epub 2013 
      Apr 15.