PMID- 23793806 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20140808 LR - 20220330 IS - 1432-2218 (Electronic) IS - 0930-2794 (Linking) VI - 27 IP - 11 DP - 2013 Nov TI - Short-term outcome of total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for overweight and obese patients with gastric cancer. PG - 4291-6 LID - 10.1007/s00464-013-3045-x [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer has been firmly established in recent decades but still is a difficult procedure, especially for obese patients, as with open surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcome of total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for early gastric cancer patients with a body mass index (BMI) exceeding 25 kg/m(2) and to consider countermeasures to this. METHODS: Perioperative outcomes were compared between 42 patients with a BMI exceeding 25 kg/m(2) [overweight or obese group (OWG)] and 174 patients with a BMI lower than 25 kg/m(2) [normal or underweight group (NWG)] who underwent TLDG between September 2010 and December 2012. RESULTS: The BMI was 26.0 +/- 1.4 kg/m(2) in the OWG group and 22.0 +/- 2.1 kg/m(2) in the NWG group (P < 0.001). The groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, presence of diabetes, number of retrieved lymph nodes, number of metastatic lymph nodes, or metastatic lymph node ratio. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the extent of lymph node dissection [OWG: D1 (11.9 %), D1+ (66.7 %), D2 (21.4 %) vs NWG: D1 (5.2 %), D1+ (51.7 %), D2 (43.1 %); P = 0.020] or tumor size (OWG: 25.5 +/- 20.2 mm vs NWG: 33.0 +/- 17.2 mm; P = 0.037). Differences in operation time (OWG: 212 +/- 31 min vs NWG: 200 +/- 35 min; P = 0.005) and estimated blood loss (OWG: 15 +/- 22 ml vs NWG: 10 +/- 34 ml; P = 0.013) seemed to have a minimal impact clinically. Postoperative complications including infectious complications and recovery after surgery did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For overweight and obese patients, TLDG was managed safely. The procedure was considered to be difficult but sufficiently feasible. FAU - Sugimoto, Motokazu AU - Sugimoto M AD - Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan, msugimot@east.ncc.go.jp. FAU - Kinoshita, Takahiro AU - Kinoshita T FAU - Shibasaki, Hidehito AU - Shibasaki H FAU - Kato, Yuichiro AU - Kato Y FAU - Gotohda, Naoto AU - Gotohda N FAU - Takahashi, Shinichiro AU - Takahashi S FAU - Konishi, Masaru AU - Konishi M LA - eng PT - Evaluation Study PT - Journal Article DEP - 20130621 PL - Germany TA - Surg Endosc JT - Surgical endoscopy JID - 8806653 SB - IM MH - Adenocarcinoma/*epidemiology/secondary/*surgery MH - Aged MH - Body Mass Index MH - Comorbidity MH - Female MH - Gastrectomy/adverse effects/*statistics & numerical data MH - Humans MH - Laparoscopy/adverse effects/*statistics & numerical data MH - Lymph Node Excision/statistics & numerical data MH - Lymph Nodes/pathology/surgery MH - Lymphatic Metastasis MH - Male MH - Obesity/*epidemiology/surgery MH - Overweight/epidemiology MH - Postoperative Complications/epidemiology/etiology MH - Stomach Neoplasms/*epidemiology/pathology/*surgery MH - Treatment Outcome EDAT- 2013/06/25 06:00 MHDA- 2014/08/13 06:00 CRDT- 2013/06/25 06:00 PHST- 2013/02/07 00:00 [received] PHST- 2013/05/28 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2013/06/25 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2013/06/25 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2014/08/13 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.1007/s00464-013-3045-x [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4291-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3045-x. Epub 2013 Jun 21.