PMID- 24136301 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20140831 LR - 20220409 IS - 1865-8652 (Electronic) IS - 0741-238X (Linking) VI - 30 IP - 10 DP - 2013 Oct TI - Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.5% following cataract surgery: integrated analysis of two clinical studies. PG - 907-23 LID - 10.1007/s12325-013-0059-7 [doi] AB - INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of loteprednol etabonate (LE) gel 0.5% compared with vehicle in the treatment of postoperative inflammation and pain following cataract surgery, using the integrated analysis of data from two identical, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, vehicle-controlled trials. METHODS: Patients with anterior chamber cell (ACC) inflammation >/= grade 2 (6-15 cells) 1 day post-surgery were randomized to receive 1 or 2 drops of LE gel 0.5% or vehicle 4 times per day instilled in the study eye for 14 days. Primary outcome measures included the proportion of patients with complete resolution of ACC and grade 0 (no) pain on postoperative Day 8. Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs), changes from baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) and visual acuity (VA), biomicroscopy, and funduscopy findings. Gel comfort was graded by patients according to drop sensation. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population included 813 patients (409 LE gel 0.5% and 404 vehicle). At postoperative Day 8, 30.8% and 15.1% of patients randomized to LE gel 0.5% or vehicle, respectively, had complete resolution of ACC, while 74.3% and 43.8% of patients, respectively, had grade 0 pain (P < 0.001 for both). Tolerability assessments for ocular itching, photophobia, and tearing favored LE gel 0.5% compared with vehicle at different time points beginning at Day 3. Two patients in the LE gel 0.5% group and 1 patient in the vehicle group exhibited a transient treatment-emergent increase in IOP >/= 10 mmHg. Treatment-related AEs were generally mild to moderate and occurred less frequently with LE gel 0.5% than with vehicle. Reports of treatment-related blurred vision were rare (n = 2, vehicle). CONCLUSION: LE gel 0.5% was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of postoperative pain and inflammation following ocular surgery, with minimal risk of IOP elevation. FAU - Rajpal, Rajesh K AU - Rajpal RK AD - See Clearly Vision Group, 8138 Watson Street, McLean, VA, 22102, USA, RRajpal@seeclearly.com. FAU - Fong, Raymond AU - Fong R FAU - Comstock, Timothy L AU - Comstock TL LA - eng SI - ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01010633 SI - ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01060072 PT - Journal Article PT - Multicenter Study PT - Randomized Controlled Trial PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20131018 PL - United States TA - Adv Ther JT - Advances in therapy JID - 8611864 RN - 0 (Androstadienes) RN - 0 (Anti-Inflammatory Agents) RN - 0 (Gels) RN - YEH1EZ96K6 (Loteprednol Etabonate) MH - Administration, Ophthalmic MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Aged, 80 and over MH - Androstadienes/*therapeutic use MH - Anterior Chamber MH - Anti-Inflammatory Agents/*therapeutic use MH - *Cataract Extraction MH - Double-Blind Method MH - Female MH - Gels MH - Humans MH - Inflammation/*drug therapy MH - Loteprednol Etabonate MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy MH - Postoperative Complications/*drug therapy MH - Treatment Outcome EDAT- 2013/10/19 06:00 MHDA- 2014/09/01 06:00 CRDT- 2013/10/19 06:00 PHST- 2013/08/08 00:00 [received] PHST- 2013/10/19 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2013/10/19 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2014/09/01 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.1007/s12325-013-0059-7 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Adv Ther. 2013 Oct;30(10):907-23. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0059-7. Epub 2013 Oct 18.