PMID- 24150706 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20140902 LR - 20211021 IS - 1435-702X (Electronic) IS - 0721-832X (Linking) VI - 252 IP - 4 DP - 2014 Apr TI - Diagnosis of subretinal neovascularization associated with idiopathic juxtafoveal retinal telangiectasia - fluorescein angiography versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. PG - 549-53 LID - 10.1007/s00417-013-2491-4 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: To compare ability of fluorescein angiography (FFA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) to diagnose subretinal neovascularization (SRNV) secondary to idiopathic juxtafoveal retinal telangiectasia (IJRT) type 2A. METHODS: Two masked observers evaluated FFA and SD-OCT images separately to diagnose the presence of SRNV in 65 eyes of 36 patients. A third masked observer diagnosed SRNV on color fundus photo. Presence of SRNV on color fundus photo was defined as presence of subretinal hemorrhage, thickening of retina, and/or visible membrane at the macula. Presence of SRNV on FFA was defined when there was hyperfluorescence in early phase with increase in intensity and size in the late phase; presence of membrane, large irregular lesion, hypofluorescence due to subretinal haemorrhage. SRNV on SD-OCT was defined as the presence of thickening of the retinal pigment epithelium-choriocapillaris complex with or without intraretinal fluid or subretinal fluid and associated with intraretinal hyperreflective area with retinal thickening. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement (Kappa) for diagnosis of SRNV on FFA and SD-OCT was 0.373 (95 % CI, 0.106-0.617) and 0.775 (95 % CI, 0.612-0.899) respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of FFA were 52.3 % and 70.0 % respectively. With regard to SD-OCT, the sensitivity and specificity were 72.7 % and 64.1 % respectively in reference to color photograph. The negative predictive value (NPV) of SD-OCT (80.6 %) was higher than FFA (73.7 %). When we considered only the presence of subretinal hemorrhage on color photograph as a confirmed diagnosis of SRNV and compared the diagnostic ability of FFA and SD-OCT, we found that the FFA had poor sensitivity (58.3 %) but a better specificity (71.8 %) than SD-OCT, which had sensitivity of 75 % and specificity of 64 % (Tables 1 and 2). However, the negative predictive value (NPV) of SD-OCT (89.29 %) was slightly better than FFA (84.85 %). CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement between the observers was better for SD-OCT than for FFA in making the diagnosis of SRNV. SD-OCT is a better diagnostic modality than FFA for ruling out the presence of SRNV. FAU - Chhablani, Jay AU - Chhablani J AD - Srimati Kanuri Santhamma Vitreo-Retina Service, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, L. V. Prasad Marg, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India. FAU - Mithal, Kopal AU - Mithal K FAU - Rao, Harsha AU - Rao H FAU - Narayanan, Raja AU - Narayanan R LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article DEP - 20131023 PL - Germany TA - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol JT - Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie JID - 8205248 SB - IM CIN - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;252(11):1863. PMID: 25196460 CIN - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;252(11):1861. PMID: 25308781 MH - Aged MH - False Negative Reactions MH - Female MH - Fluorescein Angiography/*methods MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Observer Variation MH - Predictive Value of Tests MH - Retina/pathology MH - Retinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis MH - Retinal Neovascularization/*diagnosis/etiology MH - Retinal Telangiectasis/*complications MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Sensitivity and Specificity MH - Tomography, Optical Coherence/*methods MH - Visual Acuity/physiology EDAT- 2013/10/24 06:00 MHDA- 2014/09/03 06:00 CRDT- 2013/10/24 06:00 PHST- 2013/03/04 00:00 [received] PHST- 2013/10/01 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2013/08/31 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2013/10/24 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2013/10/24 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2014/09/03 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.1007/s00417-013-2491-4 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;252(4):549-53. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2491-4. Epub 2013 Oct 23.