PMID- 24314526 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20140905 LR - 20131209 IS - 1872-6283 (Electronic) IS - 0379-0738 (Linking) VI - 233 IP - 1-3 DP - 2013 Dec 10 TI - Digital forensics: an analytical crime scene procedure model (ACSPM). PG - 244-56 LID - S0379-0738(13)00415-5 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.09.007 [doi] AB - In order to ensure that digital evidence is collected, preserved, examined, or transferred in a manner safeguarding the accuracy and reliability of the evidence, law enforcement and digital forensic units must establish and maintain an effective quality assurance system. The very first part of this system is standard operating procedures (SOP's) and/or models, conforming chain of custody requirements, those rely on digital forensics "process-phase-procedure-task-subtask" sequence. An acceptable and thorough Digital Forensics (DF) process depends on the sequential DF phases, and each phase depends on sequential DF procedures, respectively each procedure depends on tasks and subtasks. There are numerous amounts of DF Process Models that define DF phases in the literature, but no DF model that defines the phase-based sequential procedures for crime scene identified. An analytical crime scene procedure model (ACSPM) that we suggest in this paper is supposed to fill in this gap. The proposed analytical procedure model for digital investigations at a crime scene is developed and defined for crime scene practitioners; with main focus on crime scene digital forensic procedures, other than that of whole digital investigation process and phases that ends up in a court. When reviewing the relevant literature and interrogating with the law enforcement agencies, only device based charts specific to a particular device and/or more general perspective approaches to digital evidence management models from crime scene to courts are found. After analyzing the needs of law enforcement organizations and realizing the absence of crime scene digital investigation procedure model for crime scene activities we decided to inspect the relevant literature in an analytical way. The outcome of this inspection is our suggested model explained here, which is supposed to provide guidance for thorough and secure implementation of digital forensic procedures at a crime scene. In digital forensic investigations each case is unique and needs special examination, it is not possible to cover every aspect of crime scene digital forensics, but the proposed procedure model is supposed to be a general guideline for practitioners. CI - Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. FAU - Bulbul, Halil Ibrahim AU - Bulbul HI AD - Gazi University, Faculty of Education, Department of Computer, Education and Instructional Technologies, Turkey. Electronic address: bhalil@gazi.edu.tr. FAU - Yavuzcan, H Guclu AU - Yavuzcan HG FAU - Ozel, Mesut AU - Ozel M LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20130913 PL - Ireland TA - Forensic Sci Int JT - Forensic science international JID - 7902034 SB - IM MH - Documentation MH - Forensic Sciences/*organization & administration MH - Humans MH - Information Storage and Retrieval/*methods MH - Microcomputers MH - *Models, Organizational MH - Quality Control OTO - NOTNLM OT - Chain of custody (COC) OT - Crime scene OT - Digital evidence OT - Digital forensics OT - Procedure model OT - Standard operating procedure (SOP) EDAT- 2013/12/10 06:00 MHDA- 2014/09/06 06:00 CRDT- 2013/12/10 06:00 PHST- 2013/05/28 00:00 [received] PHST- 2013/08/25 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2013/09/05 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2013/12/10 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2013/12/10 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2014/09/06 06:00 [medline] AID - S0379-0738(13)00415-5 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.09.007 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Dec 10;233(1-3):244-56. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 13.