PMID- 24343249 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20140925 LR - 20220310 IS - 1531-2291 (Electronic) IS - 0890-5339 (Linking) VI - 28 IP - 7 DP - 2014 Jul TI - Can we trust intraoperative culture results in nonunions? PG - 384-90 LID - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000043 [doi] AB - OBJECTIVES: To identify the presence of bacterial biofilms in nonunions comparing molecular techniques (multiplex polymerase chain reaction and mass spectrometry, fluorescent in situ hybridization) with routine intraoperative cultures. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with nonunions were scheduled for surgery and enrolled in this ongoing prospective study. Intraoperative specimens were collected from removed implants, surrounding tissue membrane, and local soft tissue followed by standard culture analysis, Ibis's second generation molecular diagnostics (Ibis Biosystems), and bacterial 16S rRNA-based fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Confocal microscopy was used to visualize the tissue specimens reacted with the FISH probes, which were chosen based on the Ibis analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-four patient encounters were analyzed. Eight were diagnosed as infected nonunions by positive intraoperative culture results. Ibis confirmed the presence of bacteria in all 8 samples. Ibis identified bacteria in a total of 30 of 34 encounters, and these data were confirmed by FISH. Twenty-two of 30 Ibis-positive samples were culture-negative. Four samples were negative by all methods of analysis. No samples were positive by culture, but negative by molecular techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data indicate that molecular diagnostics are more sensitive for identifying bacteria than cultures in cases of bony nonunion. This is likely because of the inability of cultures to detect biofilms and bacteria previously exposed to antibiotic therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. FAU - Palmer, Michael P AU - Palmer MP AD - *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; daggerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Drexel University College of Medicine and Temple University School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; double daggerDivision of Orthopaedic Trauma, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; section signDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; ||Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; paragraph signCenter for Genomic Sciences, Allegheny-Singer Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; **Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and daggerdaggerPenn State University, State College, PA. FAU - Altman, Daniel T AU - Altman DT FAU - Altman, Gregory T AU - Altman GT FAU - Sewecke, Jeffrey J AU - Sewecke JJ FAU - Ehrlich, Garth D AU - Ehrlich GD FAU - Hu, Fen Z AU - Hu FZ FAU - Nistico, Laura AU - Nistico L FAU - Melton-Kreft, Rachel AU - Melton-Kreft R FAU - Gause, Trent M 3rd AU - Gause TM 3rd FAU - Costerton, John W AU - Costerton JW LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - United States TA - J Orthop Trauma JT - Journal of orthopaedic trauma JID - 8807705 SB - IM MH - Adolescent MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Bacteriological Techniques MH - *Biofilms MH - Device Removal MH - Female MH - Fractures, Ununited/*microbiology MH - Humans MH - In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence MH - Intraoperative Period MH - Male MH - Mass Spectrometry MH - Middle Aged MH - Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction MH - Prostheses and Implants/*microbiology MH - Prosthesis-Related Infections/*diagnosis/*microbiology MH - Young Adult EDAT- 2013/12/18 06:00 MHDA- 2014/09/26 06:00 CRDT- 2013/12/18 06:00 PHST- 2013/12/18 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2013/12/18 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2014/09/26 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000043 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jul;28(7):384-90. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000043.