PMID- 24701431 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE DCOM- 20140404 LR - 20211021 IS - 2230-8210 (Print) IS - 2230-9500 (Electronic) IS - 2230-9500 (Linking) VI - 18 IP - 1 DP - 2014 Jan TI - Are the current Indian growth charts really representative? Analysis of anthropometric assessment of school children in a South Indian district. PG - 56-62 LID - 10.4103/2230-8210.126541 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: India currently is posed by the double threat of thinness and overweight/obesity among children. Different growth charts have taken different population and give different cut-off points to assess these conditions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the anthropometry of school children, 5-18 years of age and thereby estimate the prevalence of childhood thinness, overweight and obesity. To analyze how the study population compares with that of Agarwal's growth chart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anthropometric measurements of all the students who were studying from 1(st) to 12(th) standards were taken from 27 randomly selected Government and private schools. Prevalence of thinness, overweight and obesity were assessed using two standards - Indian standard given by Agarwal and International Standards given by International Obesity Task Force (IOTF). RESULTS: The prevalence of thinness, overweight and obesity among 18,001 students enrolled as per Indian standard were 12.2%, 9.5% and 3% and as per International standard were 15.3%, 8.1% and 2.6% respectively. The mean and the 95(th) percentile values of body mass index for both boys and girls at all ages in this study are falling short of Agarwal's and IOTF values. Using international cut-offs as well as Indian cut-offs given by Agarwal, underestimate the prevalence of obesity among boys and girls of all age groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that under and over-nutrition among school children is in almost equal proportions. There is an underestimation of obesity among children whenever an Indian or an International growth chart is used. Thus, this study brings out the need for a really representative growth chart. FAU - Kumaravel, V AU - Kumaravel V AD - Institute of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Alpha Hospital and Research Center, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India. FAU - Shriraam, Vanishree AU - Shriraam V AD - Department of Community Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. FAU - Anitharani, M AU - Anitharani M AD - Department of Community Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. FAU - Mahadevan, S AU - Mahadevan S AD - Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. FAU - Balamurugan, A N AU - Balamurugan AN AD - Clinical Islet Transplant Program, Schulze Diabetes Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. FAU - Sathiyasekaran, B W C AU - Sathiyasekaran BW AD - Department of Community Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - India TA - Indian J Endocrinol Metab JT - Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism JID - 101555690 PMC - PMC3968734 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Growth chart OT - obesity OT - prevalence OT - school children OT - thinness COIS- Conflict of Interest: No. EDAT- 2014/04/05 06:00 MHDA- 2014/04/05 06:01 PMCR- 2014/01/01 CRDT- 2014/04/05 06:00 PHST- 2014/04/05 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2014/04/05 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2014/04/05 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2014/01/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - IJEM-18-56 [pii] AID - 10.4103/2230-8210.126541 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Jan;18(1):56-62. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.126541.