PMID- 24753508 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20141007 LR - 20140815 IS - 1934-6638 (Electronic) IS - 1934-662X (Linking) VI - 122 IP - 8 DP - 2014 Aug TI - Targeted multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis for elucidation of inconclusive pancreatobiliary cytology. PG - 627-34 LID - 10.1002/cncy.21429 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Endoscopic fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and brush cytology are standard methods for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary malignancies. Although the majority of cytological diagnoses are straightforward, there remains a difficult category of inconclusive cytology. This study explored the utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to improve the diagnostic stratification between reactive and malignant cells in cases of inconclusive cytology. METHODS: The multiprobe FISH assay UroVysion was used for copy number assessment of chromosomes 3, 7, 17, and the 9p21 locus on Papanicolaou-stained specimens with a diagnosis of inconclusive cytology (n = 50), adenocarcinoma (n = 31) and no evidence of malignancy (n = 9). The target cells were photographed and their coordinates saved on an automated stage prior to hybridization. A positive test was defined as increased copy number (> 2) of at least 2 chromosomes (3, 7, or 17) in at least 4 atypical cells, or loss of 9p21 in at least 12 cells. RESULTS: FISH confirmed all 31 cytological diagnoses of pancreatobiliary adenocarcinomas, and was negative in the 9 patients with negative cytology. Among the 50 cases with inconclusive cytology, FISH detected 19 of 31 cases with a final diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, and was negative in all 19 cases with no final evidence of malignancy (sensitivity of 61.3%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 61.3%). Loss of 9p21 was found in 43 (86%) of all 50 FISH-positive cases. CONCLUSIONS: Multiprobe FISH combined with automated relocation of atypical cells is a powerful technique to clarify inconclusive cytology of the pancreatobiliary tract, allowing for a better distinction between reactive atypia and malignancy. CI - (c) 2014 American Cancer Society. FAU - Vlajnic, Tatjana AU - Vlajnic T AD - Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. FAU - Somaini, Gina AU - Somaini G FAU - Savic, Spasenija AU - Savic S FAU - Barascud, Audrey AU - Barascud A FAU - Grilli, Bruno AU - Grilli B FAU - Herzog, Michelle AU - Herzog M FAU - Obermann, Ellen C AU - Obermann EC FAU - Holmes, Brittany J AU - Holmes BJ FAU - Ali, Syed Z AU - Ali SZ FAU - Degen, Lukas AU - Degen L FAU - Bubendorf, Lukas AU - Bubendorf L LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20140418 PL - United States TA - Cancer Cytopathol JT - Cancer cytopathology JID - 101499453 SB - IM MH - Adenocarcinoma/*diagnosis MH - Bile Duct Neoplasms/*diagnosis MH - Humans MH - *In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence MH - Pancreatic Neoplasms/*diagnosis MH - Predictive Value of Tests OTO - NOTNLM OT - FISH OT - atypia OT - biliary tract OT - cytology OT - fine-needle aspiration OT - fluorescence in situ hybridization OT - pancreatic cancer EDAT- 2014/04/23 06:00 MHDA- 2014/10/08 06:00 CRDT- 2014/04/23 06:00 PHST- 2013/12/23 00:00 [received] PHST- 2014/03/17 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2014/03/17 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2014/04/23 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2014/04/23 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2014/10/08 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.1002/cncy.21429 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Cancer Cytopathol. 2014 Aug;122(8):627-34. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21429. Epub 2014 Apr 18.