PMID- 24866855
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20151125
LR  - 20220316
IS  - 1536-5409 (Electronic)
IS  - 0749-8047 (Linking)
VI  - 31
IP  - 4
DP  - 2015 Apr
TI  - Pain catastrophizing differs between and within West Haven-Yale Multidimensonal 
      Pain Inventory (MPI) pain adjustment classifications: theoretical and clinical 
      implications from preliminary data.
PG  - 349-54
LID - 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000117 [doi]
AB  - OBJECTIVES: Pain catastrophizing is associated with multiple pain outcomes, and 
      is differentially associated with the adaptive coping (AC), dysfunctional (DYS), 
      and interpersonally distressed (ID) coping classifications of the West Haven-Yale 
      Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI). We examined how catastrophizing, and the 
      underlying components of magnification, rumination, and helplessness, may relate 
      to MPI classifications and differentially relate to pain outcomes across 
      classification groups to inform clinical treatment planning. MATERIALS AND 
      METHODS: Sixty-nine adults (70% women) diagnosed with musculoskeletal pain were 
      recruited from 2 pain clinics and completed self-report measures of pain 
      severity, the MPI, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the Mood and Anxiety Symptom 
      Questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients in the DYS and ID groups reported the greatest 
      levels of rumination, helplessness, and overall catastrophizing, as well as the 
      greatest depression, anxiety, and pain interference compared with the AC group. 
      Catastrophizing related to average pain only in the DYS group (P<0.05), however, 
      catastrophizing was associated with depression, anxiety, and interference 
      (Ps<0.05) among those in the AC group, with a similar pattern observed among the 
      ID group. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest a continued need for targeting 
      catastrophizing and negative affect among pain patients. However, our data 
      suggest that even among relatively well-adjusted patients, there may be clinical 
      utility in assessing catastrophic thinking given the associations of it with 
      pain-related outcomes. The present findings additionally support the value of 
      enlisting multiple theoretical perspectives such as the stress appraisal and 
      attentional models in future research and clinical applications.
FAU - Chatkoff, David K
AU  - Chatkoff DK
AD  - *Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Michigan, Dearborn, MI 
      daggerDepartment of Psychology, Salisbury University, Salisbury, MD.
FAU - Leonard, Michelle T
AU  - Leonard MT
FAU - Maier, Karl J
AU  - Maier KJ
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
PT  - Multicenter Study
PT  - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PL  - United States
TA  - Clin J Pain
JT  - The Clinical journal of pain
JID - 8507389
SB  - IM
MH  - *Adaptation, Psychological
MH  - Adolescent
MH  - Adult
MH  - *Catastrophization/complications/diagnosis/psychology
MH  - Female
MH  - Humans
MH  - *Interpersonal Relations
MH  - Male
MH  - Mood Disorders/diagnosis/*etiology
MH  - Musculoskeletal Pain/psychology
MH  - *Pain Measurement
MH  - Surveys and Questionnaires
MH  - Young Adult
EDAT- 2014/05/29 06:00
MHDA- 2015/12/15 06:00
CRDT- 2014/05/29 06:00
PHST- 2014/05/29 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2014/05/29 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2015/12/15 06:00 [medline]
AID - 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000117 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Clin J Pain. 2015 Apr;31(4):349-54. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000117.