PMID- 24901816 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20150120 LR - 20191210 IS - 1473-5687 (Electronic) IS - 0954-691X (Linking) VI - 26 IP - 7 DP - 2014 Jul TI - The accuracy of flexible spectral imaging colour enhancement for the diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia: do we still need histology to select individuals at risk for adenocarcinoma? PG - 704-9 LID - 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000108 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Targeting biopsies on the basis of visual recognition of mucosal changes in the stomach instead of the currently accepted random biopsy sampling may be attractive. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic findings using flexible spectral imaging colour enhancement (FICE) for intestinal metaplasia (IM) in the gastric mucosa. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 126 individuals aged over 50 years (27% men) was subjected to upper endoscopy using FICE. Histological assessment (per patient and per biopsy) was considered the gold standard to accuracy estimates. RESULTS: Histological assessment revealed IM in 50% of the individuals [OLGIM (operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment) stages I-IV]. Overall, endoscopy presented sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and accuracies per patient of 60% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 48-72], 87% (95% CI 79-95), 4.7 (95% CI 2.4-93), 0.45 (95% CI 0.33-0.62) and 74% (95% CI 0.66-0.82), respectively, for IM diagnosis and 71% (95% CI 37-100), 87% (95% CI 79-95), 5.6 (95% CI 2.5-12.5), 0.32 (95% CI 0.10-1.0) and 86% (95% CI 77-94), respectively, for selecting individuals with OLGIM (III-IV). The proportions of agreement (and kappa values) for IM in the antrum and the corpus were 75% (0.37) and 81% (0.19), respectively. CONCLUSION: FICE endoscopy yielded favourable results in the endoscopic diagnosis of IM of the gastric mucosa, and this is a very practical and easy method to use in daily clinical practice for unselected patients. Our study demonstrated a good specificity for FICE endoscopy to detect IM in the stomach. Further improvement in disseminating and training of this assessment is required to improve the reliability. FAU - Kikuste, Ilze AU - Kikuste I AD - aFaculty of Medicine, University of Latvia bDigestive Diseases Centre GASTRO cDepartment of Research, Riga East University Hospital dAcademic Histology Laboratory, SIA eRiga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia fCINTESIS, Porto Faculty of Medicine gDepartment of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal. FAU - Stirna, Dans AU - Stirna D FAU - Liepniece-Karele, Inta AU - Liepniece-Karele I FAU - Leja, Marcis AU - Leja M FAU - Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario AU - Dinis-Ribeiro M LA - eng PT - Clinical Trial PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PT - Validation Study PL - England TA - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol JT - European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology JID - 9000874 SB - IM MH - Adenocarcinoma/*pathology MH - Aged MH - Aged, 80 and over MH - Biopsy/methods/standards MH - Colorimetry/methods/standards MH - Female MH - Gastric Mucosa/*pathology MH - Gastroscopy/*methods/*standards MH - Humans MH - Image Enhancement/methods/standards MH - Male MH - Metaplasia/pathology MH - Middle Aged MH - Precancerous Conditions/pathology MH - Reproducibility of Results MH - Risk Assessment MH - Sensitivity and Specificity MH - Stomach Neoplasms/*pathology EDAT- 2014/06/06 06:00 MHDA- 2015/01/21 06:00 CRDT- 2014/06/06 06:00 PHST- 2014/06/06 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2014/06/06 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2015/01/21 06:00 [medline] AID - 00042737-201407000-00003 [pii] AID - 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000108 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jul;26(7):704-9. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000108.