PMID- 25012560 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20150720 LR - 20220318 IS - 1097-6779 (Electronic) IS - 0016-5107 (Linking) VI - 80 IP - 6 DP - 2014 Dec TI - Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for recurrences after previous piecemeal resection of colorectal polyps (with video). PG - 1094-102 LID - S0016-5107(14)01808-2 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.318 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Conventional endoscopic treatment of a recurrent adenoma after piecemeal EMR (PEMR) of a colorectal laterally spreading tumor (LST) is technically difficult with low en bloc resection rates because of the inability to snare fibrotic residual. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of salvage underwater EMR (UEMR) for the treatment of recurrent adenoma after PEMR of a colorectal LST. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Single, tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: Patients who have recurrent adenoma after PEMR of colorectal LST (>/=2 cm). INTERVENTIONS: UEMR versus EMR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: En bloc resection rate, endoscopic complete removal rate, recurrence rate on follow-up colonoscopy, adjunctive ablation rate with argon plasma coagulation (APC) during salvage procedure, and independent predictive factors for successful en bloc resection and endoscopic complete removal. RESULTS: Eighty salvage procedures (36 UEMRs vs 44 EMRs) were analyzed. En bloc resection rate (47.2% vs 15.9%, P = .002) and endoscopic complete removal rate (88.9% vs 31.8%, P < .001) were higher in the UEMR group than in the EMR group. APC ablation of visible residual during salvage procedure was lower in UEMR group than EMR group (11.1% vs 65.9%, P < .001). Recurrence rate on follow-up colonoscopy was significantly lower in the UEMR group than the EMR group (10% vs 39.4%, P = .02). UEMR was an independent predictor of successful en bloc resection and endoscopic complete removal. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective, single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: UEMR can be a useful and feasible technique as a salvage procedure for recurrent colorectal adenoma after PEMR. CI - Published by Elsevier Inc. FAU - Kim, Hyun Gun AU - Kim HG AD - Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. FAU - Thosani, Nirav AU - Thosani N AD - Department of Gastroenterology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. FAU - Banerjee, Subhas AU - Banerjee S AD - Department of Gastroenterology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. FAU - Chen, Ann AU - Chen A AD - Department of Gastroenterology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. FAU - Friedland, Shai AU - Friedland S AD - Department of Gastroenterology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA. LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PT - Video-Audio Media DEP - 20140708 PL - United States TA - Gastrointest Endosc JT - Gastrointestinal endoscopy JID - 0010505 RN - 059QF0KO0R (Water) SB - IM MH - Adenoma/surgery MH - Adenomatous Polyps/*surgery MH - Aged MH - Colonoscopy/*methods MH - Colorectal Neoplasms/*surgery MH - Cross-Sectional Studies MH - Feasibility Studies MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Intestinal Mucosa/*surgery MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/*surgery MH - Neoplasm, Residual MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Salvage Therapy/methods MH - *Water EDAT- 2014/07/12 06:00 MHDA- 2015/07/21 06:00 CRDT- 2014/07/12 06:00 PHST- 2014/03/15 00:00 [received] PHST- 2014/05/18 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2014/07/12 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2014/07/12 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2015/07/21 06:00 [medline] AID - S0016-5107(14)01808-2 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.318 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec;80(6):1094-102. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.318. Epub 2014 Jul 8.