PMID- 25079927 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20150309 LR - 20211021 IS - 2044-6055 (Print) IS - 2044-6055 (Electronic) IS - 2044-6055 (Linking) VI - 4 IP - 7 DP - 2014 Jul 30 TI - A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing adverse event profile and tolerability of nicergoline. PG - e005090 LID - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005090 [doi] LID - e005090 AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety profile of nicergoline compared with placebo and other active agents from published randomised controlled trials. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of nicergoline compared with placebo and other active agents across various indications. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Medline-in-process, Cochrane, EMBASE, EMBASE alerts, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Cochrane Methodology Register (CMR) for all the randomised controlled trials, open-label or blinded, in adults treated with nicergoline. Studies published until August 2013 were included. REVIEW METHOD: 29 studies were included for data extraction. The studies included in this review were majorly from European countries and mostly in cerebrovascular disease (n=15) and dementia (n=8). RESULTS: The treatment withdrawals were comparatively lower in the nicergoline group as compared with the placebo group (RR=0.92; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.21) and other active comparators (RR=0.45; 95% CI 0.10 to 1.95), but the difference was non-significant. Incidence of any adverse events (AEs) was slightly higher (RR=1.05; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.2) while incidence of serious AEs was lower (RR=0.85; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.45) in the nicergoline compared with placebo group. Frequency of anxiety was significantly lower in nicergoline as compared with placebo (p=0.01). Other AEs including diarrhoea, gastric upset, dizziness and drowsiness were less frequent in the nicergoline group when compared with placebo/active drugs, but the difference was non-significant. Frequency of hypotension and hot flushes was slightly higher in the nicergoline group but the difference was non-significant. None of the studies reported any incidence of fibrosis or ergotism with nicergoline treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Nicergoline is an ergot derivative, but its safety profile is better than other ergot derivatives like ergotamine and ergotoxine. This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that nicergoline has a good safety profile. None of the studies included in this systematic review reported any incidence of fibrosis or ergotism with nicergoline. CI - Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. FAU - Fioravanti, Mario AU - Fioravanti M AD - Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, University Hospital, Umberto I, University of Rome, Sapienza, Italy. FAU - Nakashima, Taku AU - Nakashima T AD - Department of Molecular & Internal Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan. FAU - Xu, Jun AU - Xu J AD - Jiangsu Province Geriatric Hospital, Jiangsu, China. FAU - Garg, Amit AU - Garg A AD - Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Meta-Analysis PT - Review PT - Systematic Review DEP - 20140730 PL - England TA - BMJ Open JT - BMJ open JID - 101552874 RN - 0 (Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists) RN - 0 (Neuroprotective Agents) RN - JCV8365FWN (Nicergoline) SB - IM MH - Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/*adverse effects MH - Brain Diseases/drug therapy MH - Humans MH - Neuroprotective Agents/adverse effects MH - Nicergoline/*adverse effects MH - Peripheral Vascular Diseases/drug therapy MH - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic PMC - PMC4120366 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Ergot derivatives OT - Ergotism OT - Fibrosis OT - Meta-analysis OT - Nicergoline EDAT- 2014/08/01 06:00 MHDA- 2015/03/10 06:00 PMCR- 2014/07/30 CRDT- 2014/08/01 06:00 PHST- 2014/08/01 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2014/08/01 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2015/03/10 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2014/07/30 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - bmjopen-2014-005090 [pii] AID - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005090 [doi] PST - epublish SO - BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 30;4(7):e005090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005090.