PMID- 25469285 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20240322 IS - 2049-9450 (Print) IS - 2049-9469 (Electronic) IS - 2049-9450 (Linking) VI - 3 IP - 1 DP - 2015 Jan TI - Indirect comparison of the efficacy and safety of gefitinib and cetuximab-based therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. PG - 145-150 AB - The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib and cetuximab-based therapies in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The studies to be used for the comparisons were selected from the available literature on gefitinib and cetuximab-based therapies compared to conventional chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.0 software and the Bucher approach was applied to conduct the indirect comparisons. A total of 4 studies, including 935 patients, on gefitinib therapy vs. conventional chemotherapy and 4 studies, including 1,015 patients, on cetuximab-based therapy vs. conventional chemotherapy, were used for indirect comparisons. As regards efficacy, the risk ratio (RR) of objective response rate and 1-year survival rate between gefitinib and cetuximab-based therapies in patients with advanced NSCLC were 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-1.32; P=0.9584] and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.71-1.01; P=0.0696), respectively, and the mean difference of progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were -0.15 (95% CI: -0.90 to 0.60; P=0.6946) and -1.84 (95% CI: -3.53 to -0.15; P=0.0331), respectively. As regards safety, the RR of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.19-0.44; P=0.0001). The results demonstrated that cetuximab-based therapy was superior to gefitinib therapy in terms of OS and inferior to gefitinib therapy in terms of AEs, whereas there were no significant differences in terms of efficacy and safety between the two therapies on other endpoints adopted for advanced NSCLC. However, further well-designed randomized controlled trials and continuous studies are required to confirm our findings. FAU - Tang, Jifeng AU - Tang J AD - The Research Center of National Drug Policy and Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211198, P.R. China ; School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211198, P.R. China. FAU - Zhang, Hena AU - Zhang H AD - The Research Center of National Drug Policy and Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211198, P.R. China ; School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211198, P.R. China. FAU - Yan, Jianzhou AU - Yan J AD - The Research Center of National Drug Policy and Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211198, P.R. China ; The Research Center of National Drug Policy and Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211198, P.R. China. FAU - Shao, Rong AU - Shao R AD - The Research Center of National Drug Policy and Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211198, P.R. China ; The Research Center of National Drug Policy and Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211198, P.R. China. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20140922 PL - England TA - Mol Clin Oncol JT - Molecular and clinical oncology JID - 101613422 PMC - PMC4251263 OTO - NOTNLM OT - cetuximab OT - chemotherapy OT - gefitinib OT - indirect comparison OT - meta-analysis OT - non-small-cell lung cancer EDAT- 2014/12/04 06:00 MHDA- 2014/12/04 06:01 PMCR- 2014/09/22 CRDT- 2014/12/04 06:00 PHST- 2013/11/13 00:00 [received] PHST- 2014/09/09 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2014/12/04 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2014/12/04 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2014/12/04 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2014/09/22 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - mco-03-01-0145 [pii] AID - 10.3892/mco.2014.424 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Mol Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan;3(1):145-150. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.424. Epub 2014 Sep 22.