PMID- 25712116 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20160412 LR - 20161125 IS - 1944-7876 (Electronic) IS - 1071-1007 (Linking) VI - 36 IP - 7 DP - 2015 Jul TI - Radiographic Outcomes of Postoperative Taping Following Hallux Valgus Correction. PG - 820-6 LID - 10.1177/1071100715573748 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Traditionally, hallux valgus operative correction has been accompanied by serial spica taping of the great toe during the postoperative period. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 187 adult patients who underwent proximal first metatarsal osteotomy with a modified McBride procedure in 2008-2009 (n = 83) and 2011-2012 (n = 104). Postoperatively, to maintain the corrected position of the hallux, patients from 2008 through 2009 underwent weekly spica taping, while patients from 2011 through 2012 utilized a toe separator. The hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were measured using anteroposterior weight-bearing preoperative, 2-week postoperative non-weight-bearing, and 3-month weight-bearing final follow-up radiographs. A mixed-effects linear regression model identified differences between the treatment groups over time, and a t test compared actual radiographic differences at final follow-up. RESULTS: The mixed-effects model revealed no significant difference in the HVA over time when comparing patients taped to those not taped at the preoperative (33 +/- 6 vs 33 +/- 6), 2-week postoperative (10 +/- 7 vs 9 +/- 6), and 3-month follow-up (14 +/- 6 vs 11 +/- 7) visits (P = .08). At final follow-up, the HVA was lower for the group that was not taped, but the difference (2.5 degrees) was below the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (P = .015, 95% CI 0.5-4.5). For IMA, there was improved maintenance of correction over time in the patients that were not taped compared to those taped at the preoperative (15 +/- 3 vs 15 +/- 3), 2-week postoperative (2 +/- 2 vs 3 +/- 3), and 3-month follow-up (5 +/- 4 vs 7 +/- 4) visits (P = .002). At final follow-up, the IMA was lower for the group that was not taped, but the difference (1.7 degrees) was below the MCID (P = .004, 95% CI 0.7-2.9). CONCLUSIONS: We report no radiographic benefit of postoperative taping after hallux valgus correction. The present study challenges the previous dogma of postoperative spica taping as the protocol is cost and time intensive for the patient and surgeon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative series. CI - (c) The Author(s) 2015. FAU - Ponzio, Danielle Y AU - Ponzio DY AD - Rothman Institute/Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. FAU - Pedowitz, David I AU - Pedowitz DI AD - Rothman Institute/Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. FAU - Verma, Kushagra AU - Verma K AD - Rothman Institute/Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. FAU - Maltenfort, Mitchell G AU - Maltenfort MG AD - Rothman Institute/Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. FAU - Winters, Brian S AU - Winters BS AD - Rothman Institute/Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. FAU - Raikin, Steven M AU - Raikin SM AD - Rothman Institute/Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA steven.raikin@rothmaninstitute.com. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20150224 PL - United States TA - Foot Ankle Int JT - Foot & ankle international JID - 9433869 SB - IM MH - Female MH - Hallux Valgus/*diagnostic imaging/*surgery MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Metatarsal Bones/*surgery MH - Middle Aged MH - Osteotomy/*methods MH - Postoperative Care/*methods MH - Radiography MH - Retrospective Studies MH - *Surgical Tape OTO - NOTNLM OT - bunion OT - hallux valgus OT - hallux valgus angle OT - intermetatarsal angle OT - proximal metatarsal osteotomy OT - taping EDAT- 2015/02/26 06:00 MHDA- 2016/04/14 06:00 CRDT- 2015/02/26 06:00 PHST- 2015/02/26 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2015/02/26 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2016/04/14 06:00 [medline] AID - 1071100715573748 [pii] AID - 10.1177/1071100715573748 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Jul;36(7):820-6. doi: 10.1177/1071100715573748. Epub 2015 Feb 24.