PMID- 25977348 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20161108 LR - 20170103 IS - 1742-3406 (Electronic) IS - 0144-8420 (Linking) VI - 168 IP - 3 DP - 2016 Mar TI - Doses metrics and patient age in CT. PG - 374-80 LID - 10.1093/rpd/ncv310 [doi] AB - The aim of this study was to investigate how effective dose and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) change with patient age (size) for routine head and abdominal/pelvic CT examinations. Heads and abdomens of patients were modelled as a mass-equivalent cylinder of water corresponding to the patient 'effective diameter'. Head CT scans were performed at CTDIvol(S) of 40 mGy, and abdominal CT scans were performed at CTDIvol(L) of 10 mGy. Values of SSDE were obtained using conversion factors in AAPM Task Group Report 204. Age-specific scan lengths for head and abdominal CT scans obtained from the authors' clinical practice were used to estimate the dose-length product for each CT examination. Effective doses were calculated from previously published age- and sex-specific E/DLP conversion factors, based on ICRP 103 organ-weighting factors. For head CT examinations, the scan length increased from 15 cm in a newborn to 20 cm in adults, and for an abdominal/pelvic CT, the scan length increased from 20 cm in a newborn to 45 cm in adults. For head CT scans, SSDE ranged from 37.2 mGy in adults to 48.8 mGy in a newborn, an increase of 31 %. The corresponding head CT effective doses range from 1.4 mSv in adults to 5.2 mSv in a newborn, an increase of 270 %. For abdomen CT scans, SSDE ranged from 13.7 mGy in adults to 23.0 mGy in a newborn, an increase of 68 %. The corresponding abdominal CT effective doses ranged from 6.3 mSv in adults to 15.4 mSv in a newborn, an increase of 140 %. SSDE increases much less than effective dose in paediatric patients compared with adults because it does not account for scan length or scattered radiation. Size- and age-specific effective doses better quantify the total radiation received by patients in CT by explicitly accounting for all organ doses, as well as their relative radio sensitivity. CI - (c) The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. FAU - Huda, Walter AU - Huda W AD - Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, MUSC, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, MSC 323, Charleston, SC 29425-3230, USA. FAU - Tipnis, Sameer V AU - Tipnis SV AD - Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, MUSC, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, MSC 323, Charleston, SC 29425-3230, USA tipnis@musc.edu. LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article DEP - 20150513 PL - England TA - Radiat Prot Dosimetry JT - Radiation protection dosimetry JID - 8109958 SB - IM MH - Adolescent MH - Adult MH - Female MH - Head/*diagnostic imaging MH - Humans MH - Infant, Newborn MH - Male MH - Pelvis/*diagnostic imaging MH - Radiation Dosage MH - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods MH - Young Adult EDAT- 2015/05/16 06:00 MHDA- 2016/11/09 06:00 CRDT- 2015/05/16 06:00 PHST- 2015/01/24 00:00 [received] PHST- 2015/03/27 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2015/05/16 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2015/05/16 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2016/11/09 06:00 [medline] AID - ncv310 [pii] AID - 10.1093/rpd/ncv310 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016 Mar;168(3):374-80. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv310. Epub 2015 May 13.