PMID- 26065499 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20160315 LR - 20240124 IS - 2162-0989 (Electronic) IS - 2162-0989 (Linking) VI - 4 IP - 3 DP - 2015 May-Jun TI - Clinical and Antibacterial Efficacy and Safety of Besifloxacin Ophthalmic Suspension Compared With Moxifloxacin Ophthalmic Solution. PG - 140-5 LID - 10.1097/APO.0000000000000055 [doi] AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% compared with moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis in an Indian population. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, parallel-group, clinical trial, including 6 clinical sites in India. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive 1 drop of besifloxacin or moxifloxacin in the infected eye(s), 3 times daily, for 5 days. Primary efficacy end points included clinical resolution and bacterial eradication at day 5. Secondary efficacy end points included clinical resolution and bacterial eradication at day 8, ocular discharge, bulbar conjunctival injection, investigator's global assessment, and bacterial eradication by species. Efficacy was analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel and Pearson chi2 tests. Safety was assessed by the incidence of ocular and nonocular treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), changes in visual acuity, and biomicroscopy and ophthalmoscopy findings. Data presented are that for the subset of patients from India. RESULTS: Of the 123 patients randomized at clinical sites in India, 96.7% completed the study. Day 5 differences in microbial eradication (100% besifloxacin vs 96.3% moxifloxacin) and in clinical resolution (78.9% besifloxacin vs 71.4% moxifloxacin) were not statistically significant. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed for secondary end points. All ocular AEs in both groups were mild or moderate in severity. There were no drug-related ocular AEs with besifloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis with besifloxacin 0.6% produces similar antibacterial and clinical efficacy as that with moxifloxacin 0.5% in an Indian population, with no clinically meaningful safety concerns. FAU - Garg, Prashant AU - Garg P AD - From the *L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad; daggerDr Shroff's Charity Eye Centre, Delhi; double daggerShroff Eye Centre, Gurgaon, Haryana; and section signDr R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India; and paragraph signMedical Affairs, Bausch + Lomb, Rochester, NY and parallelR&D Microbiology and Sterilization Sciences. FAU - Mathur, Umang AU - Mathur U FAU - Sony, Parul AU - Sony P FAU - Tandon, Radhika AU - Tandon R FAU - Morris, Timothy W AU - Morris TW FAU - Comstock, Timothy L AU - Comstock TL LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Multicenter Study PT - Randomized Controlled Trial PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - United States TA - Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) JT - Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.) JID - 101583622 RN - 0 (Anti-Bacterial Agents) RN - 0 (Azepines) RN - 0 (Fluoroquinolones) RN - 0 (Ophthalmic Solutions) RN - 0 (Suspensions) RN - 0 (Topoisomerase II Inhibitors) RN - BFE2NBZ7NX (besifloxacin) RN - U188XYD42P (Moxifloxacin) SB - IM MH - Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage MH - Azepines/*administration & dosage MH - Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/*drug therapy MH - Double-Blind Method MH - Fluoroquinolones/*administration & dosage MH - Follow-Up Studies MH - Humans MH - Moxifloxacin MH - Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage MH - Suspensions/administration & dosage MH - Topoisomerase II Inhibitors/administration & dosage MH - Treatment Outcome EDAT- 2015/06/13 06:00 MHDA- 2016/03/16 06:00 CRDT- 2015/06/13 06:00 PHST- 2015/06/13 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2015/06/13 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2016/03/16 06:00 [medline] AID - S2162-0989(23)00573-X [pii] AID - 10.1097/APO.0000000000000055 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2015 May-Jun;4(3):140-5. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000055.