PMID- 26196017 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE DCOM- 20150721 LR - 20240326 IS - 2053-3624 (Print) IS - 2053-3624 (Electronic) IS - 2053-3624 (Linking) VI - 2 IP - 1 DP - 2015 TI - Treatment choices in elderly patients with ST: elevation myocardial infarction-insights from the Vital Heart Response registry. PG - e000235 LID - 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000235 [doi] LID - e000235 AB - BACKGROUND: Management of elderly patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is challenging and they are under-represented in trials. Accordingly, we analysed reperfusion strategies and their effectiveness in patients with STEMI >/=75 years compared to <75 years within a comprehensive inclusive registry. METHODS: Consecutive patients with STEMI admitted to hospital and tracked within a regional registry (2006-2011) were analysed comparing reperfusion strategy (primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), fibrinolysis and no reperfusion) between patients >/=75 vs <75 years old as well as across the reperfusion strategies in those >/=75 years. RESULTS: There were 3588 patients with STEMI with 646 (18%) >/=75 years old. Elderly patients were more likely female (46.9% vs 18.4%) and had more prior: angina (28.2% vs 17.2%), myocardial infarction (MI; 22.8% vs 13.9%), hypertension (67.6% vs 44.2%), heart failure (2.3% vs 0.3%) and atrial fibrillation (2.2% vs 0.5%) (all p<0.001). The reperfusion strategy for patients >/=75 vs <75: PPCI 45.3% vs 41.2%, fibrinolysis 24.8% vs 45.7%, and no reperfusion 29.9% vs 13.1% (p<0.001). Time from symptoms to first medical contact (median, 93 vs 78 min p=0.008) and PPCI (median, 166 vs 136 min (p<0.001) were longer for >/=75 years. In those >/=75 years outcomes by reperfusion (PPCI, fibrinolysis and none) were: in-hospital death 13.3%, 9.4% and 19.7% (p=0.018), and composite of death, recurrent-MI, cardiogenic shock and congestive heart failure 28%, 20% and 33.2% (p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients have more comorbidities, worst in-hospital clinical outcomes and are less likely to receive reperfusion. Acknowledging physician selection of the reperfusion strategy; outcomes appear favourable in the elderly receiving fibrinolysis. FAU - Toleva, Olga AU - Toleva O AD - University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta , Canada. FAU - Ibrahim, Quazi AU - Ibrahim Q AD - University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta , Canada. FAU - Brass, Neil AU - Brass N AD - Royal Alexandra Hospital and CK Hui Heart Centre , Edmonton, Alberta , Canada. FAU - Sookram, Sunil AU - Sookram S AD - University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta , Canada. FAU - Welsh, Robert AU - Welsh R AD - University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta , Canada ; Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Edmonton, Alberta , Canada. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20150624 PL - England TA - Open Heart JT - Open heart JID - 101631219 PMC - PMC4488892 EDAT- 2015/07/22 06:00 MHDA- 2015/07/22 06:01 PMCR- 2015/06/24 CRDT- 2015/07/22 06:00 PHST- 2014/12/27 00:00 [received] PHST- 2015/05/12 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2015/06/03 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2015/07/22 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2015/07/22 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2015/07/22 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2015/06/24 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - openhrt-2014-000235 [pii] AID - 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000235 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Open Heart. 2015 Jun 24;2(1):e000235. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000235. eCollection 2015.