PMID- 26309842 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE DCOM- 20150827 LR - 20200930 IS - 2225-319X (Print) IS - 2304-1021 (Electronic) IS - 2225-319X (Linking) VI - 4 IP - 4 DP - 2015 Jul TI - Current state of transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip. PG - 335-40 LID - 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.02.02 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Many patients affected with mitral valve regurgitation suffer from multiple comorbidities. The MitraClip device provides a safe means of transcatheter valve repair in patients with suitable mitral valve anatomy who are at prohibitive risk for surgery. We describe our early procedural outcomes and present a summary of the current state of MitraClip technology in the United States. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of initial high-risk or inoperable patients who underwent MitraClip placement at our institution after completion of the EVEREST II study. We examined the primary outcome of 30-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included extent of reduction of mitral regurgitation (MR), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improvement, length of stay, and major complications. RESULTS: A total of 115 high-risk patients (mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality 9.4%+/-6.1%) underwent the MitraClip procedure at our institution between March 2009 and April 2014. Co-morbidities including coronary artery disease (67.8%), pulmonary disease (39.1%) and previous cardiac surgery (44.3%) were common. The device was placed successfully in all patients with a 30-day mortality of 2.6%. All patients demonstrated 3+ or 4+ MR on preoperative imaging, and 80.7% of patients had trace or 1+ MR at hospital discharge. NYHA class improved substantially, with 79% of patients exhibiting class III or IV symptoms pre-procedure and 81% reporting class I or II symptoms at one month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The MitraClip procedure provides a safe alternative to surgical or medical management for high-risk patients with MR and suitable valve anatomy. A comprehensive heart team approach is essential, with surgeons providing critical assessment of patient suitability for surgery versus percutaneous therapy as well as performance of the valve procedure. FAU - Downs, Emily A AU - Downs EA AD - 1 Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2 Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Virginia, USA. FAU - Lim, D Scott AU - Lim DS AD - 1 Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2 Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Virginia, USA. FAU - Saji, Mike AU - Saji M AD - 1 Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2 Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Virginia, USA. FAU - Ailawadi, Gorav AU - Ailawadi G AD - 1 Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2 Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Virginia, USA. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - China TA - Ann Cardiothorac Surg JT - Annals of cardiothoracic surgery JID - 101605877 PMC - PMC4526504 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Mitral regurgitation (MR) OT - cardiac catheterization/intervention OT - percutaneous EDAT- 2015/08/27 06:00 MHDA- 2015/08/27 06:01 PMCR- 2015/07/01 CRDT- 2015/08/27 06:00 PHST- 2015/01/03 00:00 [received] PHST- 2015/01/18 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2015/08/27 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2015/08/27 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2015/08/27 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2015/07/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - acs-04-04-335 [pii] AID - 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.02.02 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jul;4(4):335-40. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.02.02.