PMID- 26444424 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20160609 LR - 20201209 IS - 1932-6203 (Electronic) IS - 1932-6203 (Linking) VI - 10 IP - 10 DP - 2015 TI - Efficacy and Safety of Metronidazole Monotherapy versus Vancomycin Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PG - e0137252 LID - 10.1371/journal.pone.0137252 [doi] LID - e0137252 AB - BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has become a global epidemiological problem for both hospitalized patients and outpatients. The most commonly used drugs to treat CDI are metronidazole and vancomycin. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of metronidazole monotherapy with vancomycin monotherapy and combination therapy in CDI patients. METHODS: A comprehensive search without publication status or other restrictions was conducted. Studies comparing metronidazole monotherapy with vancomycin monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with CDI were considered eligible. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated and reported. RESULTS: Of the 1910 records identified, seventeen studies from thirteen articles (n = 2501 patients) were included. No statistically significant difference in the rate of clinical cure was found between metronidazole and vancomycin for mild CDI (OR = 0.67, 95% CI (0.45, 1.00), p = 0.05) or between either monotherapy and combination therapy for CDI (OR = 1.07, 95% CI (0.58, 1.96), p = 0.83); however, the rate of clinical cure was lower for metronidazole than for vancomycin for severe CDI (OR = 0.46, 95% CI (0.26, 0.80), p = 0.006). No statistically significant difference in the rate of CDI recurrence was found between metronidazole and vancomycin for mild CDI (OR = 0.99, 95% CI (0.40, 2.45), p = 0.98) or severe CDI (OR = 0.98, 95% CI (0.63, 1.53), p = 0.94) or between either monotherapy and combination therapy for CDI (OR = 0.91, 95% CI (0.66, 1.26), p = 0.56). In addition, there was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events (AEs) between metronidazole and vancomycin (OR = 1.18, 95% CI (0.80, 1.74), p = 0.41). In contrast, the rate of AEs was significantly lower for either monotherapy than for combination therapy (OR = 0.30, 95% CI (0.17, 0.51), p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Metronidazole and vancomycin are equally effective for the treatment of mild CDI, but vancomycin is superior for the treatment of severe CDI. Combination therapy is not superior to monotherapy because it appears to be associated with an increase in the rate of AEs. FAU - Li, Rui AU - Li R AD - College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. FAU - Lu, Laichun AU - Lu L AD - Department of Pharmacy, Third Affiliated Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. FAU - Lin, Yu AU - Lin Y AD - College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. FAU - Wang, Mingxia AU - Wang M AD - College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. FAU - Liu, Xin AU - Liu X AD - College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PT - Meta-Analysis PT - Review PT - Systematic Review DEP - 20151007 PL - United States TA - PLoS One JT - PloS one JID - 101285081 RN - 0 (Anti-Bacterial Agents) RN - 140QMO216E (Metronidazole) RN - 6Q205EH1VU (Vancomycin) SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use MH - Child MH - Child, Preschool MH - Clostridioides difficile/*drug effects MH - Drug Therapy, Combination MH - Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/*drug therapy MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Metronidazole/adverse effects/*therapeutic use MH - Middle Aged MH - Treatment Outcome MH - Vancomycin/adverse effects/*therapeutic use PMC - PMC4621873 COIS- Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. EDAT- 2015/10/09 06:00 MHDA- 2016/06/10 06:00 PMCR- 2015/10/07 CRDT- 2015/10/08 06:00 PHST- 2015/04/01 00:00 [received] PHST- 2015/08/13 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2015/10/08 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2015/10/09 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2016/06/10 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2015/10/07 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - PONE-D-15-12504 [pii] AID - 10.1371/journal.pone.0137252 [doi] PST - epublish SO - PLoS One. 2015 Oct 7;10(10):e0137252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137252. eCollection 2015.