PMID- 26471931 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20160711 LR - 20181202 IS - 1873-4111 (Electronic) IS - 0378-5122 (Linking) VI - 83 DP - 2016 Jan TI - Osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women aged 50-64 years: BMI alone compared with current screening tools. PG - 59-64 LID - S0378-5122(15)30058-X [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.09.009 [doi] AB - OBJECTIVES: Consensus on when to initiate DXA screening for early postmenopausal women (< 65 years of age) is lacking. Low body mass index (BMI) has been proposed as one of the major risk factors for osteoporosis. This study sought to compare the predictive performance of BMI alone with 5 screening modalities (the U.S. Preventive services task force [USPSTF] FRAX threshold of 9.3%, a risk factor based approach [>/= 1 risk factors], the osteoporosis self-assessment tool [OST < 2], the osteoporosis risk assessment instrument [ORAI >/= 9], and the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation [SCORE >/= 6]) in identifying early postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: Postmenopausal women aged 50-64 years presenting for a DXA test were recruited between January 1, 2007, and March 1, 2009. Demographic data and osteoporosis risk factors were obtained through a telephone survey. The performance of each screening tool in predicting osteoporosis was compared. RESULTS: Of 445 study participants, 95% were White, 38 had osteoporosis (T-score /= 6) appears to be the best (sensitivity: 92%, LR-: 0.24, AUC: 0.75, NNS: 9). CONCLUSION: BMI (< 28) had a comparable numerical screening performance overall to the current screening modalities. BMI (< 28) could be considered a potential indicator when screening early postmenopausal White women for osteoporosis. However, a better osteoporosis screening tool remains to be developed. CI - Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. FAU - Jiang, Xuezhi AU - Jiang X AD - Reading Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reading, PA, United States; Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philadelphia, PA, United States. Electronic address: Daniel.Jiang@readinghealth.org. FAU - Good, Lauren E AU - Good LE AD - Reading Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reading, PA, United States. FAU - Spinka, Ryan AU - Spinka R AD - Reading Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reading, PA, United States. FAU - Schnatz, Peter F AU - Schnatz PF AD - Reading Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reading, PA, United States; Reading Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Reading, PA, United States; Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States. LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article DEP - 20151003 PL - Ireland TA - Maturitas JT - Maturitas JID - 7807333 SB - IM MH - *Absorptiometry, Photon MH - Area Under Curve MH - *Body Mass Index MH - Bone Density MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Mass Screening/*methods MH - Middle Aged MH - Osteoporosis/*diagnosis MH - Postmenopause MH - Predictive Value of Tests MH - Risk Assessment MH - Risk Factors OTO - NOTNLM OT - Bone mineral density OT - DXA scan OT - Early postmenopausal women OT - Osteoporosis screening EDAT- 2015/10/17 06:00 MHDA- 2016/07/12 06:00 CRDT- 2015/10/17 06:00 PHST- 2015/07/20 00:00 [received] PHST- 2015/09/25 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2015/09/28 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2015/10/17 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2015/10/17 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2016/07/12 06:00 [medline] AID - S0378-5122(15)30058-X [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.09.009 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Maturitas. 2016 Jan;83:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Oct 3.