PMID- 26606429 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20170602 LR - 20220408 IS - 1528-1140 (Electronic) IS - 0003-4932 (Linking) VI - 264 IP - 6 DP - 2016 Dec TI - Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract vs Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Plus a Bioprosthetic Anal Fistula Plug Procedure in Patients With Transsphincteric Anal Fistula: Early Results of a Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial. PG - 917-922 AB - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) with an additional plug (LIFT-plug) in the treatment of transsphincteric anal fistula. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Both LIFT and LIFT-plug are recently reported effective alternatives of transsphincteric anal fistula. METHODS: This multicenter prospective randomized study (NCT01478139) was conducted at 5 university hospitals throughout China. A total of 235 patients were randomly assigned to undergo LIFT (118 patients) or LIFT-plug (117 patients) between March 2011 and April 2013. The primary outcome measured was primary healing rate at 6 months postoperatively and healing time. Secondary outcomes included recurrence rate, postoperative pain, and incontinence rate. RESULTS: The LIFT procedure showed shorter operative time than the LIFT-plug procedure (26.7 min vs 28.5 min, P = 0.03). Median healing time was 22 days in LIFT-plug group vs 30 days in LIFT group (P < 0.001). The difference in visual analog scale scores across all time points was not statistically significant between the groups (P = 0.13). The primary healing rate was higher in LIFT-plug group than in LIFT group [94.0% (95% confidence interval 89.7%-98.3%) vs 83.9% (95% confidence interval 77.2%-90.6%), P < 0.001]. There were no reported incontinence and recurrence within the follow-up period of 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with transsphincteric anal fistulas, both LIFT-plug and LIFT are simple, safe, and effective procedures. LIFT-plug has the advantage of a higher healing rate, less healing time, and a lower early postoperative pain score. FAU - Han, Jia Gang AU - Han JG AD - *Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical Univerisity, Beijing, People's Republic of ChinadaggerDepartment of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hosptial, Beijing, People's Republic of Chinadouble daggerDepartment of General Surgery, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China section signDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of the School of Medicine Xi An Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China paragraph signDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China. FAU - Wang, Zhen Jun AU - Wang ZJ FAU - Zheng, Yi AU - Zheng Y FAU - Chen, Chao Wen AU - Chen CW FAU - Wang, Xiao Qiang AU - Wang XQ FAU - Che, Xiang Ming AU - Che XM FAU - Song, Wei Liang AU - Song WL FAU - Cui, Jin Jie AU - Cui JJ LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Multicenter Study PT - Randomized Controlled Trial PL - United States TA - Ann Surg JT - Annals of surgery JID - 0372354 SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Bioprosthesis MH - China MH - Fecal Incontinence/epidemiology MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Ligation MH - Male MH - Operative Time MH - Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology MH - Prospective Studies MH - Rectal Fistula/*surgery MH - Recurrence MH - Treatment Outcome MH - Urinary Incontinence/epidemiology MH - Wound Healing EDAT- 2015/11/26 06:00 MHDA- 2017/06/03 06:00 CRDT- 2015/11/26 06:00 PHST- 2015/11/26 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2017/06/03 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2015/11/26 06:00 [entrez] AID - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001562 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Ann Surg. 2016 Dec;264(6):917-922. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001562.