PMID- 26850486 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20161026 LR - 20190918 IS - 1540-1413 (Electronic) IS - 1540-1405 (Linking) VI - 14 IP - 2 DP - 2016 Feb TI - Evaluating the Impact of Provincial Implementation of Screening for Distress on Quality of Life, Symptom Reports, and Psychosocial Well-Being in Patients With Cancer. PG - 164-72 AB - BACKGROUND: Although a number of accreditation agencies and professional societies recommend routine screening for distress (SFD) for patients with cancer, it has been integrated very slowly into clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: This evaluation investigated the impact of a large-scale SFD intervention on patients' quality of life, symptom reports, and psychosocial well-being. The SFD intervention involved (1) completion of the SFD tool by patients, (2) discussion between patient and provider about the concerns indicated, and (3) provision of appropriate assessments/interventions based on priority concerns. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This quality improvement work included a pre-evaluation and postevaluation of the impact of implementation on patients' well-being. Patients in cohort 1 (N=740) were surveyed before implementation, whereas patients in cohort 2 (N=534) were surveyed 10 months after the implementation at 17 clinics province-wide. As part of the implementation, providers received training on assessing and responding to patient priority concerns with the standardized tool. RESULTS: No differences were seen in total score of quality of life between the cohorts. Fewer patients in cohort 2 than in cohort 1 reported health problems, including tiredness, drowsiness, poor appetite, nausea, anxiety, and poor well-being. Similarly, significantly fewer patients in cohort 2 endorsed problems relating to emotional, practical, informational, spiritual, social, and physical aspects of well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed significantly improved psychological and physical symptoms and psychosocial well-being after routine SFD was implemented, suggesting that a large-scale SFD intervention is beneficial for patients when it is integrated into existing clinical practice and community resources. CI - Copyright (c) 2016 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. FAU - Watson, Linda AU - Watson L AD - CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Alberta FAU - Groff, Shannon AU - Groff S AD - CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Alberta FAU - Tamagawa, Rie AU - Tamagawa R AD - CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Alberta FAU - Looyis, Jennifer AU - Looyis J AD - CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Alberta FAU - Farkas, Sydney AU - Farkas S AD - CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Alberta FAU - Schaitel, Brent AU - Schaitel B AD - CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Alberta FAU - DeIure, Andrea AU - DeIure A AD - CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Alberta FAU - Faris, Peter AU - Faris P AD - CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Alberta FAU - Bultz, Barry D AU - Bultz BD AD - Department of Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary AD - Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - United States TA - J Natl Compr Canc Netw JT - Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN JID - 101162515 SB - IM MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Neoplasms/*complications/*psychology MH - Quality of Life/*psychology MH - Stress, Psychological/*diagnosis/*etiology/*psychology EDAT- 2016/02/07 06:00 MHDA- 2016/10/27 06:00 CRDT- 2016/02/07 06:00 PHST- 2016/02/07 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2016/02/07 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2016/10/27 06:00 [medline] AID - 14/2/164 [pii] AID - 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0019 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Feb;14(2):164-72. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0019.