PMID- 26916633 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20170322 LR - 20170817 IS - 1522-726X (Electronic) IS - 1522-1946 (Linking) VI - 88 IP - 1 DP - 2016 Jul TI - Very late stent thrombosis with second generation drug eluting stents compared to bare metal stents: Network meta-analysis of randomized primary percutaneous coronary intervention trials. PG - 38-48 LID - 10.1002/ccd.26458 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: The relative safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) continues to be debated. The long-term clinical outcomes between second generation DES and BMS for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using network meta-analysis were compared. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing stent types (first generation DES, second generation DES, or BMS) were considered for inclusion. A search strategy used Medline, Embase, Cochrane databases, and proceedings of international meetings. Information about study design, inclusion criteria, and sample characteristics were extracted. Network meta-analysis was used to pool direct (comparison of second generation DES to BMS) and indirect evidence (first generation DES with BMS and second generation DES) from the randomized trials. RESULTS: Twelve trials comparing all stents types including 9,673 patients randomly assigned to treatment groups were analyzed. Second generation DES was associated with significantly lower incidence of definite or probable ST (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.89), MI (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.89), and TVR at 3 years (OR 0.50: 95% CI 0.31-0.81) compared with BMS. In addition, there was a significantly lower incidence of MACE with second generation DES versus BMS (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.74) at 3 years. These were driven by a higher rate of TVR, MI and stent thrombosis in the BMS group at 3 years. There was a non-significant reduction in the overall and cardiac mortality [OR 0.83, 95% CI (0.60-1.14), OR 0.88, 95% CI (0.6-1.28)] with the use of second generation DES versus BMS at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Network meta-analysis of randomized trials of primary PCI demonstrated lower incidence of MACE, MI, TVR, and stent thrombosis with second generation DES compared with BMS. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. CI - (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. FAU - Philip, Femi AU - Philip F AD - Department of Internal Medicine and Biostatistics, University of California, Davis, California. FAU - Stewart, Susan AU - Stewart S AD - Department of Internal Medicine and Biostatistics, University of California, Davis, California. FAU - Southard, Jeffrey A AU - Southard JA AD - Department of Internal Medicine and Biostatistics, University of California, Davis, California. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Meta-Analysis PT - Review DEP - 20160224 PL - United States TA - Catheter Cardiovasc Interv JT - Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions JID - 100884139 RN - 0 (Metals) SB - IM CIN - Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;88(1):49-50. PMID: 27400635 MH - Coronary Thrombosis/diagnosis/*etiology/mortality/therapy MH - Drug-Eluting Stents MH - Humans MH - *Metals MH - Network Meta-Analysis MH - Odds Ratio MH - Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects/*instrumentation/mortality MH - Prosthesis Design MH - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic MH - Recurrence MH - Retreatment MH - Risk Factors MH - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis/mortality/*therapy MH - *Stents MH - Stroke/etiology MH - Time Factors MH - Treatment Outcome OTO - NOTNLM OT - acute myocardial infarction OT - drug-eluting stent OT - percutaneous coronary intervention EDAT- 2016/02/27 06:00 MHDA- 2017/03/23 06:00 CRDT- 2016/02/27 06:00 PHST- 2015/08/19 00:00 [received] PHST- 2015/11/05 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2016/01/18 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2016/02/27 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2016/02/27 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2017/03/23 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.1002/ccd.26458 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;88(1):38-48. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26458. Epub 2016 Feb 24.