PMID- 27212721
OWN - NLM
STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE
DCOM- 20160523
LR  - 20200930
IS  - 0019-5049 (Print)
IS  - 0976-2817 (Electronic)
IS  - 0019-5049 (Linking)
VI  - 60
IP  - 5
DP  - 2016 May
TI  - Learning and performance of endotracheal intubation by paramedical students: 
      Comparison of GlideScope((R)) and intubating laryngeal mask airway with direct 
      laryngoscopy in manikins.
PG  - 337-42
LID - 10.4103/0019-5049.181595 [doi]
AB  - BACKGROUND AND AIMS: GlideScope video laryngoscope (GVL) and intubating laryngeal 
      mask airway (I-LMA) may be used to facilitate intubation and secure the airway in 
      patients with normal and abnormal airways. The aim of this study was to evaluate 
      whether (GVL) and (I-LMA) facilitate and improve the tracheal intubation success 
      rate and could be learned and performed easily by paramedic students when 
      compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscopy (DL). METHODS: This study was a 
      prospective, randomised crossover trial that included 100 paramedic students. 
      Macintosh DL, I-LMA and GVL were tested in both normal and difficult airway 
      scenarios. Each participant was allowed up to three intubation attempts with each 
      device, in each scenario. The time required to perform tracheal intubation, the 
      success rate, number of intubation attempts and of optimisation manoeuvres and 
      the severity of dental trauma were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed 
      using Chi-square, one-way ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate, followed 
      by post hoc test. RESULTS: GVL and I-LMA required less time to successfully 
      perform tracheal intubation, showed a greater success rate of intubation, reduced 
      the number of intubation attempts and optimization manoeuvres required and 
      reduced the severity of dental trauma compared to Macintosh DL in both normal and 
      difficult airway scenarios. CONCLUSION: GVL and I-LMA provide better airway 
      management than Macintosh DL in both normal and difficult airway scenarios.
FAU - Bahathiq, Adil Omar
AU  - Bahathiq AO
AD  - Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 
      Mukarramah, Saudi Arabia.
FAU - Abdelmontaleb, Tharwat Helmy
AU  - Abdelmontaleb TH
AD  - Department of Anesthesia Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al 
      Qura University, Makkah Mukarramah, Saudi Arabia.
FAU - Newigy, Mohammed Khairt
AU  - Newigy MK
AD  - Department of Anesthesia Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al 
      Qura University, Makkah Mukarramah, Saudi Arabia.
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
PL  - India
TA  - Indian J Anaesth
JT  - Indian journal of anaesthesia
JID - 0013243
PMC - PMC4870947
OTO - NOTNLM
OT  - Airway management
OT  - intratracheal
OT  - intubation
OT  - laryngeal mask
OT  - laryngoscopy
EDAT- 2016/05/24 06:00
MHDA- 2016/05/24 06:01
PMCR- 2016/05/01
CRDT- 2016/05/24 06:00
PHST- 2016/05/24 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2016/05/24 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2016/05/24 06:01 [medline]
PHST- 2016/05/01 00:00 [pmc-release]
AID - IJA-60-337 [pii]
AID - 10.4103/0019-5049.181595 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Indian J Anaesth. 2016 May;60(5):337-42. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.181595.