PMID- 27242654 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE DCOM- 20160531 LR - 20200929 IS - 1664-2295 (Print) IS - 1664-2295 (Electronic) IS - 1664-2295 (Linking) VI - 7 DP - 2016 TI - BDNF Genotype Interacts with Motor Function to Influence Rehabilitation Responsiveness Poststroke. PG - 69 LID - 10.3389/fneur.2016.00069 [doi] LID - 69 AB - BACKGROUND: Persistent motor impairment is common but highly heterogeneous poststroke. Genetic polymorphisms, including those identified on the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genes, may contribute to this variability by limiting the capacity for use-dependent neuroplasticity, and hence rehabilitation responsiveness. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether BDNF and APOE genotypes influence motor improvement facilitated by poststroke upper-limb rehabilitation. METHODS: BDNF-Val66Met and APOE isoform genotypes were determined using leukocyte DNA for 55 community-dwelling patients 2-123 months poststroke. All patients completed a dose-matched upper-limb rehabilitation program of either Wii-based Movement Therapy or Constraint-induced Movement Therapy. Upper-limb motor function was assessed pre- and post-therapy using a suite of functional measures. RESULTS: Motor function improved for all patients post-therapy, with no difference between therapy groups. In the pooled data, there was no significant effect of BDNF or APOE genotype on motor function at baseline, or following the intervention. However, a significant interaction between the level of residual motor function and BDNF genotype was identified (p = 0.029), whereby post-therapy improvement was significantly less for Met allele carriers with moderate and high, but not low motor function. There was no significant association between APOE genotype and therapy outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study identified a novel interaction between the BDNF-Val66Met polymorphism, motor-function status, and the magnitude of improvement with rehabilitation in chronic stroke. This polymorphism does not preclude, but may reduce, the magnitude of motor improvement with therapy, particularly for patients with higher, but not lower residual motor function. BDNF genotype should be considered in the design and interpretation of clinical trials. FAU - Shiner, Christine T AU - Shiner CT AD - Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. FAU - Pierce, Kerrie D AU - Pierce KD AD - Neuroscience Research Australia , Sydney, NSW , Australia. FAU - Thompson-Butel, Angelica G AU - Thompson-Butel AG AD - Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. FAU - Trinh, Terry AU - Trinh T AD - Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. FAU - Schofield, Peter R AU - Schofield PR AD - Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. FAU - McNulty, Penelope A AU - McNulty PA AD - Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20160517 PL - Switzerland TA - Front Neurol JT - Frontiers in neurology JID - 101546899 PMC - PMC4868962 OTO - NOTNLM OT - apolipoprotein E OT - brain-derived neurotrophic factor OT - motor rehabilitation OT - stroke genetics OT - upper limb EDAT- 2016/06/01 06:00 MHDA- 2016/06/01 06:01 PMCR- 2016/05/17 CRDT- 2016/06/01 06:00 PHST- 2016/03/04 00:00 [received] PHST- 2016/04/25 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2016/06/01 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2016/06/01 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2016/06/01 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2016/05/17 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.3389/fneur.2016.00069 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Front Neurol. 2016 May 17;7:69. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00069. eCollection 2016.