PMID- 27500487 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20171113 LR - 20171113 IS - 1600-0846 (Electronic) IS - 0909-752X (Linking) VI - 23 IP - 2 DP - 2017 May TI - A randomized, controlled trial comparing skin health effects and comfort of two adult incontinence protective underwear. PG - 202-211 LID - 10.1111/srt.12320 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: It is important to confirm product use effects on skin health for products intended for prolonged skin contact. This study compared experimental and marketed reference adult incontinence protective underwear. METHODS: Randomized, single-blind (examiner), parallel study evaluating skin health effects in predominantly obese incontinent women normally using protective underwear (approximately 20% Type II Diabetes). Subjects wore experimental or marketed reference protective underwear daily, 14 consecutive days. Visual skin grading, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) assessed before, after 1 and 2 weeks of product wear. Overall assessment of comfort assessed. RESULTS: Of the 122 subjects (60 experimental and 62 marketed reference), 22 were diabetic and 88 were postmenopausal. Under the conditions of this study, there were no statistically significant differences in overall change from baseline for visual grading and TEWL between the experimental product and the marketed reference product for all subjects. Changes from baseline for skin erythema and skin marking were generally small for both products for all subjects as well as for both diabetics and non-diabetics. There were no serious adverse events (AEs), and no withdrawals due to AEs. Overall comfort assessments of size and fit were 'just right,' and skin comfort in the leg, waist and crotch areas were 'comfortable' or 'very comfortable' for both products. CONCLUSIONS: In-use 14-day testing demonstrated few statistical differences between experimental product with unique odor neutralizing technology and currently marketed product for skin assessments and comfort. Both products were comfortable and well-tolerated. CI - (c) 2016 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. FAU - Trowbridge, M M AU - Trowbridge MM AD - Department of Global Clinical Sciences, The Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH, USA. FAU - Wang, B AU - Wang B AD - Department of Quantitative Sciences, The Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH, USA. FAU - Gutshall, D AU - Gutshall D AD - Department of Central Product Safety, The Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH, USA. FAU - Rodenberg, C A AU - Rodenberg CA AD - Department of Quantitative Sciences, The Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH, USA. FAU - Farage, M A AU - Farage MA AD - Department of Global Clinical Sciences, The Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH, USA. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Randomized Controlled Trial DEP - 20160808 PL - England TA - Skin Res Technol JT - Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) JID - 9504453 SB - IM MH - Causality MH - Comorbidity MH - Dermatitis, Contact/*epidemiology/prevention & control MH - Equipment Design MH - Equipment Failure Analysis MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Incontinence Pads/*statistics & numerical data MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Patient Comfort MH - Patient Satisfaction/*statistics & numerical data MH - Prevalence MH - Protective Clothing/*statistics & numerical data MH - Risk Factors MH - Single-Blind Method MH - Treatment Outcome MH - Urinary Incontinence/*epidemiology/*nursing OTO - NOTNLM OT - diabetes OT - erythema OT - female incontinence OT - protective underwear OT - skin health OT - transepidermal water loss EDAT- 2016/08/09 06:00 MHDA- 2017/11/14 06:00 CRDT- 2016/08/09 06:00 PHST- 2016/06/21 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2016/08/09 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2017/11/14 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2016/08/09 06:00 [entrez] AID - 10.1111/srt.12320 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Skin Res Technol. 2017 May;23(2):202-211. doi: 10.1111/srt.12320. Epub 2016 Aug 8.