PMID- 27536449 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE DCOM- 20160818 LR - 20200930 IS - 2155-6660 (Print) IS - 2155-6660 (Electronic) IS - 2155-6660 (Linking) VI - 3 IP - 1 DP - 2014 TI - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of flexible doses of levomilnacipran ER (40-120 mg/day) in patients with major depressive disorder. PG - 10-9 LID - 10.3109/21556660.2014.884505 [doi] AB - OBJECTIVE: Levomilnacipran ER is a potent and selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Efficacy and safety have been evaluated in five Phase II/III studies, four of which met the pre-specified primary efficacy outcome. Results of the negative trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00969150) are reported here. METHODS: A Phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing flexible-dose levomilnacipran ER 40-120 mg/day with placebo was conducted in outpatients with MDD. Patients met the DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD, had a current episode of depression of at least 4 weeks' duration, and a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score >/=30. The study comprised a 1-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in, 8-week double-blind treatment, and a 2-week down-taper. The primary and secondary efficacy measures were change from baseline to Week 8 in MADRS and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total scores, respectively, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures approach. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), laboratory and vital sign measures, the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, and the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX). RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-five patients received the study drug and had >/=1 post-baseline MADRS total score assessment (ITT Population); 81.9% of placebo and 77.1% of levomilnacipran ER patients completed the study. For levomilnacipran ER vs placebo, MADRS (-15.7 vs -14.2) and SDS (-8.8 vs -8.2) total score improvements, and rates of MADRS response (38.5% vs 34.8%) and remission (25.3% vs 23.8%) were numerically greater but differences were not statistically significant. Levomilnacipran ER was generally well tolerated. More levomilnacipran ER patients vs placebo reported AEs; the most common AEs for levomilnacipran ER were nausea (17%) and headache (16%). Mean changes in most safety measures were small and similar between groups. There were no meaningful differences in total ASEX scores between groups. LIMITATIONS: Short duration of treatment, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and lack of an active comparator. CONCLUSION: Numerical improvements for levomilnacipran ER vs placebo were detected in this study, but the differences were not statistically significant; levomilnacipran ER was generally well tolerated. FAU - Gommoll, Carl P AU - Gommoll CP AD - Forest Research Institute, Jersey City, NJUSA. FAU - Greenberg, William M AU - Greenberg WM AD - Forest Research Institute, Jersey City, NJUSA. FAU - Chen, Changzheng AU - Chen C AD - Forest Research Institute, Jersey City, NJUSA. LA - eng SI - ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00969150 PT - Journal Article DEP - 20140116 PL - England TA - J Drug Assess JT - Journal of drug assessment JID - 101672979 PMC - PMC4937636 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Antidepressant clinical trial OT - Levomilnacipran ER OT - Major depressive disorder (MDD) OT - Serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) EDAT- 2014/01/01 00:00 MHDA- 2014/01/01 00:01 PMCR- 2014/01/01 CRDT- 2016/08/19 06:00 PHST- 2014/01/09 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2016/08/19 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2014/01/01 00:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2014/01/01 00:01 [medline] PHST- 2014/01/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - ijda-3-10 [pii] AID - 10.3109/21556660.2014.884505 [doi] PST - epublish SO - J Drug Assess. 2014 Jan 16;3(1):10-9. doi: 10.3109/21556660.2014.884505. eCollection 2014.