PMID- 27646327 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20170404 LR - 20181202 IS - 1724-6016 (Electronic) IS - 1120-6721 (Linking) VI - 27 IP - 2 DP - 2017 Mar 10 TI - Spectral versus time-domain OCT in detecting preoperative epiretinal membranes that accompany macular holes. PG - 185-189 LID - 10.5301/ejo.5000862 [doi] AB - PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivities of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) versus time-domain OCT (TD-OCT) in identifying epiretinal membranes (ERM) preoperatively in patients who underwent surgery for full-thickness macular holes (FTMH). METHODS: This is an interventional retrospective case series of 59 eyes diagnosed with FTMHs who underwent 25-G pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling between 2009 and 2015. Preoperative OCTs were obtained by SD-OCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg, Germany) or TD-OCT (Stratus, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA). Volume scans were reviewed for ERM accompanying the FTMH. This was compared to indocyanine green-negative staining and intraoperative findings of ERM as the gold standard. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics between the SD-OCT and TD-OCT groups were comparable. Mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 41.4 weeks (+/-49.0). Of 59 eyes, 33 (55.9%) exhibited an ERM intraoperatively. Four ERMs (SD-OCT group) compared to 12 (TD-OCT group) were not visualized on preoperative OCT (p = 0.003). Sensitivity and specificity of SD-OCT in ERM detection was 79% and 100% compared to 14% and 91% for TD-OCT. Visual acuity improved in both arms (0.5 and 0.3 logMAR units in SD-OCT and TD-OCT, respectively (p = 0.002, 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: We found that SD-OCT was superior to TD-OCT in identifying the presence of ERM preoperatively in patients who underwent macular hole surgery. Since ERMs may decrease the chance of successful pharmacologic vitreolysis, we recommend using SD-OCT over TD-OCT in the evaluation of patients with FTMH to more accurately identify ERMs and allow more comprehensive treatment decisions (pharmacologic versus surgical). FAU - Rao, Prethy AU - Rao P AD - Department of Ophthalmology, Beaumont Eye Institute, Royal Oak, MI - USA. FAU - Yonekawa, Yoshihiro AU - Yonekawa Y AD - Department of Ophthalmology, Beaumont Eye Institute, Royal Oak, MI - USA. AD - Associated Retinal Consultants, Royal Oak, MI - USA. FAU - Thomas, Benjamin J AU - Thomas BJ AD - Department of Ophthalmology, Beaumont Eye Institute, Royal Oak, MI - USA. AD - Associated Retinal Consultants, Royal Oak, MI - USA. FAU - Drenser, Kimberly A AU - Drenser KA AD - Department of Ophthalmology, Beaumont Eye Institute, Royal Oak, MI - USA. AD - Associated Retinal Consultants, Royal Oak, MI - USA. LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article DEP - 20160917 PL - United States TA - Eur J Ophthalmol JT - European journal of ophthalmology JID - 9110772 RN - 0 (Coloring Agents) RN - IX6J1063HV (Indocyanine Green) SB - IM MH - Aged MH - Coloring Agents/administration & dosage MH - Epiretinal Membrane/*diagnosis/surgery MH - Female MH - Germany MH - Humans MH - Indocyanine Green/administration & dosage MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Retinal Perforations/*diagnosis/surgery MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Sensitivity and Specificity MH - Tomography, Optical Coherence/*methods MH - Visual Acuity/physiology MH - Vitrectomy EDAT- 2016/10/30 06:00 MHDA- 2017/04/05 06:00 CRDT- 2016/09/21 06:00 PHST- 2016/08/01 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2016/10/30 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2017/04/05 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2016/09/21 06:00 [entrez] AID - 1275C8D1-CD61-48D0-9242-44052E434E2B [pii] AID - 10.5301/ejo.5000862 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 10;27(2):185-189. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000862. Epub 2016 Sep 17.