PMID- 27732025
OWN - NLM
STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE
LR  - 20191120
IS  - 1939-1846 (Electronic)
IS  - 0021-843X (Linking)
VI  - 125
IP  - 7
DP  - 2016 Oct
TI  - "Psychosis-predictive value of self-reported schizotypy in a clinical high-risk 
      sample": Correction to Fluckiger et al. (2016).
PG  - 945
AB  - Reports an error in "Psychosis-Predictive Value of Self-Reported Schizotypy in a 
      Clinical High-Risk Sample" by Rahel Fluckiger, Stephan Ruhrmann, Martin Debbane, 
      Chantal Michel, Daniela Hubl, Benno G. Schimmelmann, Joachim Klosterkotter and 
      Frauke Schultze-Lutter (Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Advanced Online 
      Publication, Sep 1, 2016, np). In the article, there was an error in the Author 
      Note. The affiliation of Daniela Hubl was incorrectly listed as "University 
      Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of 
      Bern." It should have been listed as "University Hospital of Psychiatry and 
      Psychotherapy, University of Bern." All versions of this article have been 
      corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 
      2016-41994-001.) Schizotypy is considered an indicator of psychosis-proneness and 
      therefore, a precursor to schizophrenia-spectrum psychosis. In the early 
      detection of psychosis, the widely used ultra high-risk criteria refer to the 
      positive features of schizotypy and schizotypal personality disorders (SPD). In 
      clinical high risk (CHR) samples, self-reported or clinically assessed SPD, 
      notably the lack of close friends, has been suggested to facilitate the 
      prediction of psychosis. In community samples, self-reported schizotypy has 
      mainly been assessed psychometrically using the 4 Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales 
      (WSS; Chapman, Chapman, Kwapil, Eckbald, & Zinser, 1994), and the positive 
      schizotypy dimension was consistently predictive of psychosis (Debbane et al., 
      2015). However, psychometrically assessed schizotypy has not yet been studied as 
      a potential predictor of psychosis in CHR samples. To bridge this gap, we studied 
      the psychosis-predictive value of 3 of the WSSs and their association with CHR 
      state in a clinical sample. One hundred 28 patients (23 +/- 7 years; 81% considered 
      CHR) from 2 early detection services were followed for 12 to 101 months. Within 
      48 months, 36 (28.1%) converted to psychosis. Only physical anhedonia was 
      associated with CHR state, and high scores for physical anhedonia were predictive 
      of conversion in conjunction with the CHR state. Physical anhedonia rather than 
      positive schizotypy scales might separate future converters from nonconverters in 
      clinical samples already presenting a phenomenologically more extreme range on 
      the psychosis continuum. Given their reported psychosis-predictive value in 
      nonclinical samples, psychometric schizotypy measures in general might be useful 
      for the initial screening of psychosis-proneness in the community, whereas 
      physical anhedonia might be particularly useful in CHR samples.
CI  - PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
PT  - Published Erratum
PL  - United States
TA  - J Abnorm Psychol
JT  - Journal of abnormal psychology
JID - 0034461
EFR - J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 Oct;125(7):923-932. PMID: 27583768
EDAT- 2016/10/13 06:00
MHDA- 2016/10/13 06:01
CRDT- 2016/10/13 06:00
PHST- 2016/10/13 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2016/10/13 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2016/10/13 06:01 [medline]
AID - 2016-47529-004 [pii]
AID - 10.1037/abn0000227 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 Oct;125(7):945. doi: 10.1037/abn0000227.