PMID- 27908161 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20170315 LR - 20170315 IS - 2473-4209 (Electronic) IS - 0094-2405 (Linking) VI - 43 IP - 12 DP - 2016 Dec TI - Technical Note: Magnetic field effects on Gafchromic-film response in MR-IGRT. PG - 6552 AB - PURPOSE: Magnetokinetic changes may affect crystal orientation and polymerization within the active layer of radiochromic film (RCF). This effect is investigated in a magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy unit within the context of film dosimetry. METHODS: Gafchromic EBT2 RCF was irradiated in a 30 x 30 x 30 cm(3) solid water phantom using a Co-60 MRI guided radiotherapy system (B = 0.35 T) under normal operating conditions, and under the exact conditions and setup without a magnetic field. Fifteen 20.3 x 25.4 cm(2) EBT2 film sheets were placed at three different depths (d = 0.5, 5, and 10 cm) using five different treatment plans. The plans were computed using the MRIdian (ViewRay, Inc.) treatment planning system to deliver doses between 0 and 17.6 Gy. Films were analyzed before and after irradiation to obtain the net optical density (netOD) for each color channel separately. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were obtained to compare the active layer of selected samples. RESULTS: The results indicated that the red channel netOD decreased between 0.013 and 0.123 (average of 0.060 +/- 0.033) for doses above 2.8 Gy, with a linear increase in this effect for higher doses. Green channel netOD showed similar results with a decrease between 0.012 and 0.105 (average of 0.041 +/- 0.027) for doses above 3.5 Gy. The blue channel showed the weakest effect with a netOD decrease between 0.013 and 0.029 (average of 0.020 +/- 0.006) for doses above 8.0 Gy. SEM images show changes in crystal orientation within active layer in RCF exposed in a magnetic field. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a magnetic field affects crystal orientation and polymerization during irradiation, where netOD decreased by an average of 8.7%, 8.0%, and 4.3% in the red, green, and blue channels, respectively. The under response was dependent on dose and differed by up to 15% at 17.6 Gy. FAU - Reynoso, Francisco J AU - Reynoso FJ AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. FAU - Curcuru, Austen AU - Curcuru A AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. FAU - Green, Olga AU - Green O AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. FAU - Mutic, Sasa AU - Mutic S AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. FAU - Das, Indra J AU - Das IJ AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York 10016. FAU - Santanam, Lakshmi AU - Santanam L AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - United States TA - Med Phys JT - Medical physics JID - 0425746 SB - IM MH - Equipment Design MH - *Film Dosimetry MH - *Magnetic Fields MH - *Magnetic Resonance Imaging MH - Phantoms, Imaging MH - *Radiotherapy, Image-Guided EDAT- 2016/12/03 06:00 MHDA- 2017/03/16 06:00 CRDT- 2016/12/03 06:00 PHST- 2016/12/03 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2016/12/03 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2017/03/16 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.1118/1.4967486 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Med Phys. 2016 Dec;43(12):6552. doi: 10.1118/1.4967486.