PMID- 27942084 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20191120 IS - 0138-9130 (Print) IS - 0138-9130 (Linking) VI - 109 IP - 3 DP - 2016 TI - Measuring efficiency of university-industry Ph.D. projects using best worst method. PG - 1911-1938 AB - A collaborative Ph.D. project, carried out by a doctoral candidate, is a type of collaboration between university and industry. Due to the importance of such projects, researchers have considered different ways to evaluate the success, with a focus on the outputs of these projects. However, what has been neglected is the other side of the coin-the inputs. The main aim of this study is to incorporate both the inputs and outputs of these projects into a more meaningful measure called efficiency. A ratio of the weighted sum of outputs over the weighted sum of inputs identifies the efficiency of a Ph.D. PROJECT: The weights of the inputs and outputs can be identified using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. Data on inputs and outputs are collected from 51 Ph.D. candidates who graduated from Eindhoven University of Technology. The weights are identified using a new MCDM method called Best Worst Method (BWM). Because there may be differences in the opinion of Ph.D. candidates and supervisors on weighing the inputs and outputs, data for BWM are collected from both groups. It is interesting to see that there are differences in the level of efficiency from the two perspectives, because of the weight differences. Moreover, a comparison between the efficiency scores of these projects and their success scores reveals differences that may have significant implications. A sensitivity analysis divulges the most contributing inputs and outputs. FAU - Salimi, Negin AU - Salimi N AD - Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands. FAU - Rezaei, Jafar AU - Rezaei J AD - Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20160917 PL - Switzerland TA - Scientometrics JT - Scientometrics JID - 7901197 PMC - PMC5124053 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Best worst method (BWM) OT - Collaborative Ph.D. project OT - Efficiency OT - Multi-criteria decision-making OT - University-industry collaboration EDAT- 2016/12/13 06:00 MHDA- 2016/12/13 06:01 PMCR- 2016/09/17 CRDT- 2016/12/13 06:00 PHST- 2016/05/25 00:00 [received] PHST- 2016/12/13 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2016/12/13 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2016/12/13 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2016/09/17 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 2121 [pii] AID - 10.1007/s11192-016-2121-0 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Scientometrics. 2016;109(3):1911-1938. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2121-0. Epub 2016 Sep 17.