PMID- 28338529 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20170501 LR - 20170501 IS - 1473-5628 (Electronic) IS - 0143-3636 (Linking) VI - 38 IP - 5 DP - 2017 May TI - Dosimetry software Hermes Internal Radiation Dosimetry: from quantitative image reconstruction to voxel-level absorbed dose distribution. PG - 357-365 LID - 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000662 [doi] AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to validate a software package called Hermes Internal Radiation Dosimetry (HIRD) for internal dose assessment tailored for clinical practice. The software includes all the necessary steps to perform voxel-level absorbed dose calculations including quantitative reconstruction, image coregistration and volume of interest tools. METHODS: The basics of voxel-level dosimetry methods and implementations to HIRD software are reviewed. Then, HIRD is validated using simulated SPECT/CT data and data from Lu-DOTATATE-treated patients by comparing absorbed kidney doses with OLINDA/EXM-based dosimetry. In addition, electron and photon dose components are studied separately in an example patient case. RESULTS: The simulation study showed that HIRD can reproduce time-activity curves accurately and produce absorbed doses with less than 10% error for the kidneys, liver and spleen. From the patient data, the absorbed kidney doses calculated using HIRD and using OLINDA/EXM were highly correlated (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r=0.98). From Bland-Altman plot analysis, an average absorbed dose difference of -2% was found between the methods. In addition, we found that in Lu-DOTATATE-treated patients, photons can contribute over 10% of the kidney's total dose and is partly because of cross-irradiation from high-uptake lesions close to the kidneys. CONCLUSION: HIRD is a straightforward voxel-level internal dosimetry software. Its clinical utility was verified with simulated and clinical Lu-DOTATATE-treated patient data. Patient studies also showed that photon contribution towards the total dose can be relatively high and voxel-level dose calculations can be valuable in cases where the target organ is in close proximity to high-uptake organs. FAU - Hippelainen, Eero T AU - Hippelainen ET AD - aClinical Research Institute HUCH Ltd bDepartment of Physics, University of Helsinki cHUS Medical Imaging Center, Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital dDepartment of Oncology, Cancer Centre, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki eJoint Authority for Paijat-Hame Social and Health Care, Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Lahti, Finland fHERMES Medical Solutions, Stockholm, Sweden. FAU - Tenhunen, Mikko J AU - Tenhunen MJ FAU - Maenpaa, Hanna O AU - Maenpaa HO FAU - Heikkonen, Jorma J AU - Heikkonen JJ FAU - Sohlberg, Antti O AU - Sohlberg AO LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - England TA - Nucl Med Commun JT - Nuclear medicine communications JID - 8201017 SB - IM MH - Humans MH - *Image Processing, Computer-Assisted MH - Kidney/diagnostic imaging MH - Phantoms, Imaging MH - *Radiation Dosage MH - Radiometry/*methods MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography MH - *Software EDAT- 2017/03/25 06:00 MHDA- 2017/05/02 06:00 CRDT- 2017/03/25 06:00 PHST- 2017/03/25 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2017/05/02 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2017/03/25 06:00 [entrez] AID - 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000662 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Nucl Med Commun. 2017 May;38(5):357-365. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000662.