PMID- 28467597 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20171129 LR - 20171129 IS - 1939-165X (Electronic) IS - 0275-6382 (Linking) VI - 46 IP - 2 DP - 2017 Jun TI - Objective evaluation of analyzer performance based on a retrospective meta-analysis of instrument validation studies: point-of-care hematology analyzers. PG - 248-261 LID - 10.1111/vcp.12492 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Information on quality requirements and objective evaluation of performance of veterinary point-of-care analyzers (POCAs) is scarce. OBJECTIVES: The study was aimed at assessing observed total errors (TE(obs) s) for veterinary hematology POCAs via meta-analysis and comparing TE(obs) to allowable total error (TE(a) ) specifications based on experts' opinions. METHODS: The TE(obs) for POCAs (impedance and laser-based) was calculated based on data from instrument validation studies published between 2006 and 2013 as follows: TE(obs) = 2 x CV [%] + bias [%]. The CV was taken from published studies; the bias was estimated from the regression equation at 2 different concentration levels of measurands. To fulfill quality requirements, TE(obs) should be < TE(a) . Measurands were considered as globally acceptable if > 60% of analyzers showed TE(obs) < TE(a) . RESULTS: Six studies evaluating 11 analyzers and 5 studies evaluating 5 analyzers were included for canine and feline hematology variables, respectively. For the CBC, TE(obs) was < 15% for canine and < 13% for feline measurands, except for HGB and platelet counts. Measurands of the CBC, excluding differential WBC and platelet counts, and HGB concentration were considered globally acceptable. For most of the cell types in the WBC differential count, TE(obs) was > TE(a) (data from 3 analyzers). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis is considered a pilot study. Experts' requirements (TE(obs) < TE(a) ) were fulfilled for most measurands except HGB (due to instrument-related bias for the ADVIA 2120) and platelet counts. Available data on the WBC differential count suggest an analytic bias, so nonstatistical quality control is recommended. CI - (c) 2017 American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology. FAU - Cook, Andrea M AU - Cook AM AD - Department of Clinical Sciences, Clinical Pathophysiology and Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany. FAU - Moritz, Andreas AU - Moritz A AD - Department of Clinical Sciences, Clinical Pathophysiology and Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany. FAU - Freeman, Kathleen P AU - Freeman KP AD - IDEXX Laboratories, Ltd., Wetherby, UK. FAU - Bauer, Natali AU - Bauer N AD - Department of Clinical Sciences, Clinical Pathophysiology and Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Meta-Analysis DEP - 20170503 PL - United States TA - Vet Clin Pathol JT - Veterinary clinical pathology JID - 9880575 SB - IM MH - Animals MH - Blood Cell Count/instrumentation/veterinary MH - Cat Diseases/blood MH - Cats/blood MH - Dog Diseases/blood MH - Dogs/blood MH - Hematology/*instrumentation/standards MH - Hemoglobinometry/instrumentation/veterinary MH - Leukocyte Count/instrumentation/veterinary MH - Pathology, Veterinary/*instrumentation/standards MH - Platelet Count/instrumentation/veterinary MH - *Point-of-Care Systems/standards MH - Retrospective Studies OTO - NOTNLM OT - In-clinic hematology analyzers OT - quality goal index OT - six sigma metrics OT - total allowable error OT - total observed error EDAT- 2017/05/04 06:00 MHDA- 2017/12/01 06:00 CRDT- 2017/05/04 06:00 PHST- 2017/05/04 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2017/12/01 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2017/05/04 06:00 [entrez] AID - 10.1111/vcp.12492 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Vet Clin Pathol. 2017 Jun;46(2):248-261. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12492. Epub 2017 May 3.