PMID- 28601868 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20180507 LR - 20220410 IS - 1423-0356 (Electronic) IS - 0025-7931 (Linking) VI - 94 IP - 2 DP - 2017 TI - Pulmonary Rehabilitation Outcomes after Single or Double Lung Transplantation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Interstitial Lung Disease. PG - 178-185 LID - 10.1159/000477351 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) following lung transplantation (LTx) has been shown to be effective with regard to exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQL). However, outcome data is limited with respect to LTx as a population. Differences concerning the effects of PR in patients with single LTx (SLTx) or double LTx (DLTx) have not been studied yet. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to compare possible differences concerning PR outcomes between SLTx and DLTx. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis (period: 1997-2016), data from 722 patients with either chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; SLTx: n = 129, FEV1 51 +/- 17% pred.; DLTx: n = 204, FEV1 74 +/- 20% pred.) or interstitial lung disease (ILD; SLTx: n = 135, FVC 58 +/- 18% pred.; DLTx: n = 254, FVC 63 +/- 18% pred.) after LTx were included. All patients underwent a specialized inpatient PR program. The data of the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and HRQL (physical [PCS] and mental [MCS] component summary of the SF- 36 questionnaire) were analyzed. RESULTS: Independently from the procedure and pretransplant diagnosis, patients significantly (p < 0.05) improved the 6MWD without any differences between SLTx and DLTx (COPD: SLTx: +109 +/- 68 m, DLTx: +117 +/- 82 m; ILD: SLTx: +115 +/- 80 m, DLTx: +132 +/- 77 m). The PCS (COPD: SLTx: +9 +/- 9 points, DLTx: +7 +/- 9 points; ILD: SLTx: +6 +/- 9 points, DLTx: +9 +/- 9 points) and MCS (COPD: SLTx: +8 +/- 15 points, DLTx: +7 +/- 15 points; ILD: SLTx: +10 +/- 13 points, DLTx: +8 +/- 12 points) also improved significantly without any group differences. CONCLUSIONS: LTx patients with a pretransplant diagnosis of COPD or ILD all benefitted significantly and with clinical relevance with regard to exercise capacity and HRQL from an inpatient PR performed within 1 year postoperatively. PR outcomes were similar regardless of SLTx or DLTx. CI - (c) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel. FAU - Schneeberger, Tessa AU - Schneeberger T AD - Department of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps University of Marburg, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany. FAU - Gloeckl, Rainer AU - Gloeckl R FAU - Welte, Tobias AU - Welte T FAU - Kenn, Klaus AU - Kenn K LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20170610 PL - Switzerland TA - Respiration JT - Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases JID - 0137356 SB - IM MH - Activities of Daily Living MH - Aged MH - Female MH - Forced Expiratory Volume MH - Health Status MH - Humans MH - Lung/*physiopathology MH - Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology/*surgery MH - Lung Transplantation/*rehabilitation MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology/*surgery MH - Quality of Life MH - *Respiratory Therapy MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Treatment Outcome MH - Walk Test OTO - NOTNLM OT - Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease OT - Exercise training OT - Interstitial lung disease OT - Lung transplantation OT - Pulmonary rehabilitation EDAT- 2017/06/12 06:00 MHDA- 2018/05/08 06:00 CRDT- 2017/06/12 06:00 PHST- 2017/01/20 00:00 [received] PHST- 2017/05/05 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2017/06/12 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2018/05/08 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2017/06/12 06:00 [entrez] AID - 000477351 [pii] AID - 10.1159/000477351 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Respiration. 2017;94(2):178-185. doi: 10.1159/000477351. Epub 2017 Jun 10.