PMID- 28635362 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20180521 LR - 20180521 IS - 1941-837X (Electronic) IS - 1369-6998 (Linking) VI - 20 IP - 9 DP - 2017 Sep TI - Costs and effectiveness of fingolimod versus alemtuzumab in the treatment of highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the UK: re-treatment, discount, and disutility. PG - 962-973 LID - 10.1080/13696998.2017.1345748 [doi] AB - OBJECTIVE: Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) treated with disease modifying therapies (DMTs) who continue to experience disease activity may be considered for escalation therapies such as fingolimod, or may be considered for alemtuzumab. Previous economic modeling used Markov models; applying one alternative technique, discrete event simulation (DES) modeling, allows re-treatment and long-term adverse events (AEs) to be included in the analysis. METHODS: A DES was adapted to model relapse-triggered re-treatment with alemtuzumab and the effect of including ongoing quality-adjusted life year (QALY) decrements for AEs that extend beyond previous 1-year Markov cycles. As the price to the NHS of fingolimod in the UK is unknown, due to a confidential patient access scheme (PAS), a variety of possible discounts were tested. The interaction of re-treatment assumptions for alemtuzumab with the possible discounts for fingolimod was tested to determine which DMT resulted in lower lifetime costs. The lifetime QALY results were derived from modeled treatment effect and short- and long-term AEs. RESULTS: Most permutations of fingolimod PAS discount and alemtuzumab re-treatment rate resulted in fingolimod being less costly than alemtuzumab. As the percentage of patients who are re-treated with alemtuzumab due to experiencing a relapse approaches 100% of those who relapse whilst on treatment, the discount required for fingolimod to be less costly drops below 5%. Consideration of treatment effect alone found alemtuzumab generated 0.2 more QALYs/patient; the inclusion of AEs up to a duration of 1 year reduced this advantage to only 0.14 QALYs/patient. Modeling AEs with a lifetime QALY decrement found that both DMTs generated very similar QALYs with the difference only 0.04 QALYs/patient. CONCLUSIONS: When the model captured alemtuzumab re-treatment and long-term AE decrements, it was found that fingolimod is cost-effective compared to alemtuzumab, assuming application of only a modest level of confidential PAS discount. FAU - Montgomery, Stephen M AU - Montgomery SM AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-8481-5850 AD - a Costello Medical Consulting Ltd , Cambridge , UK. FAU - Kusel, Jeanette AU - Kusel J AD - a Costello Medical Consulting Ltd , Cambridge , UK. FAU - Nicholas, Richard AU - Nicholas R AD - b Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital , London , UK. FAU - Adlard, Nicholas AU - Adlard N AD - c Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd , Camberley, Surrey , UK. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20170711 PL - England TA - J Med Econ JT - Journal of medical economics JID - 9892255 RN - 0 (Immunosuppressive Agents) RN - 3A189DH42V (Alemtuzumab) RN - G926EC510T (Fingolimod Hydrochloride) SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Alemtuzumab/economics/*therapeutic use MH - Cost-Benefit Analysis MH - Female MH - Fingolimod Hydrochloride/economics/*therapeutic use MH - Health Expenditures MH - Humans MH - Immunosuppressive Agents/economics/*therapeutic use MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Models, Economic MH - Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/*drug therapy MH - Prescription Fees MH - Quality-Adjusted Life Years MH - State Medicine MH - United Kingdom OTO - NOTNLM OT - Multiple sclerosis OT - alemtuzumab OT - cost-effectiveness OT - cost-utility OT - fingolimod OT - highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis EDAT- 2017/06/22 06:00 MHDA- 2018/05/22 06:00 CRDT- 2017/06/22 06:00 PHST- 2017/06/22 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2018/05/22 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2017/06/22 06:00 [entrez] AID - 10.1080/13696998.2017.1345748 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Med Econ. 2017 Sep;20(9):962-973. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1345748. Epub 2017 Jul 11.