PMID- 28647864
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20181010
LR  - 20211204
IS  - 1436-3771 (Electronic)
IS  - 1432-6981 (Linking)
VI  - 22
IP  - 2
DP  - 2018 Mar
TI  - Bonding of composite resins to PEEK: the influence of adhesive systems and 
      air-abrasion parameters.
PG  - 763-771
LID - 10.1007/s00784-017-2151-x [doi]
AB  - OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the tensile bond 
      strength (TBS) to polyaryletheretherketone (PEEK) after different pretreatment 
      and conditioning methods. METHODS: Four hundred PEEK specimens were fabricated 
      and allocated to the following air-abrasion methods (n (1) = 80/pretreatment): 
      (i) 50 mum Al(2)O(3) (0.05 MPa); (ii) 50 mum Al(2)O(3) (0.35 MPa); (iii) 110 mum 
      Al(2)O(3) (0.05 MPa); (iv) 110 mum Al(2)O(3) (0.35 MPa); and (v) Rocatec 110 mum 
      (0.28 MPa). These pretreatments were combined with the following conditioning 
      methods (n (2) = 20/pretreatment/conditioning): (a) visio.link (VL); (b) Monobond 
      Plus/Heliobond (MH); (c) Scotchbond Universal (SU); and (d) dialog bonding fluid 
      (DB). After veneering of all specimens with dialog occlusal and aging (28 days 
      H(2)O, 37  degrees C + 20,000 thermal cycles, 5/55  degrees C), TBS was measured. Data was 
      analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with Breslow-Gehan test and 
      Cox-regressions. RESULTS: The major impact on TBS showed the conditioning, 
      followed by the air-abrasion-pressure, while the grain size of the air-abrasion 
      powder did not show any effect. Specimens air-abraded at 0.35 MPa showed the 
      highest survival rates. However, within VL groups, this observation was not 
      statistically significant. Within MH groups, pretreatment using 110 mum Al(2)O(3) 
      and 0.05 MPa resulted in higher survival rates compared to groups treated with 50 
      and 110 mum Al(2)O(3) using a pressure of 0.35 MPa. The use of VL showed the 
      highest survival rates between the adhesive systems and the TBS values higher 
      than 25 MPa independent of the pretreatment method. As an exception, only VL 
      showed significantly higher survival rates when compared to MH. CONCLUSIONS: The 
      adequate choice of the adhesive system and higher pressures improved the TBS 
      between PEEK and veneering resin composite. The particle size had no major 
      impact. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: According to this study, best veneering of PEEK with 
      dialog occlusal can be achieved by conditioning with visio.link in combination 
      with the pretreatment of airborne particle abrasion at a pressure of 0.35 MPa.
FAU - Stawarczyk, Bogna
AU  - Stawarczyk B
AD  - Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Ludwig-Maximilians-University 
      Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336, Munich, Germany. 
      Bogna.stawarczyk@med.uni-muenchen.de.
FAU - Taufall, Simon
AU  - Taufall S
AD  - Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Ludwig-Maximilians-University 
      Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
FAU - Roos, Malgorzata
AU  - Roos M
AD  - Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention 
      Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland.
FAU - Schmidlin, Patrick R
AU  - Schmidlin PR
AD  - Clinic of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology, and Cariology, Center of Dental, 
      Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
FAU - Lumkemann, Nina
AU  - Lumkemann N
AD  - Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Ludwig-Maximilians-University 
      Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
DEP - 20170624
PL  - Germany
TA  - Clin Oral Investig
JT  - Clinical oral investigations
JID - 9707115
RN  - 0 (Benzophenones)
RN  - 0 (Composite Resins)
RN  - 0 (Dental Cements)
RN  - 0 (Ketones)
RN  - 0 (Polymers)
RN  - 31694-16-3 (polyetheretherketone)
RN  - 3WJQ0SDW1A (Polyethylene Glycols)
MH  - Air Abrasion, Dental
MH  - Benzophenones
MH  - Composite Resins/*chemistry
MH  - *Dental Bonding
MH  - Dental Cements/*chemistry
MH  - Dental Stress Analysis
MH  - Ketones/*chemistry
MH  - Materials Testing
MH  - Polyethylene Glycols/*chemistry
MH  - Polymers
MH  - Surface Properties
MH  - Tensile Strength
OTO - NOTNLM
OT  - Airborne particle abrasion
OT  - Failure type
OT  - PEEK
OT  - Tensile bond strengths
OT  - Veneering resin composite
EDAT- 2017/06/26 06:00
MHDA- 2018/10/12 06:00
CRDT- 2017/06/26 06:00
PHST- 2016/05/29 00:00 [received]
PHST- 2017/06/07 00:00 [accepted]
PHST- 2017/06/26 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2018/10/12 06:00 [medline]
PHST- 2017/06/26 06:00 [entrez]
AID - 10.1007/s00784-017-2151-x [pii]
AID - 10.1007/s00784-017-2151-x [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):763-771. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2151-x. Epub 
      2017 Jun 24.