PMID- 28802556 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20180727 LR - 20181202 IS - 1097-6779 (Electronic) IS - 0016-5107 (Print) IS - 0016-5107 (Linking) VI - 86 IP - 6 DP - 2017 Dec TI - Randomized sham-controlled trials in endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events. PG - 972-985.e3 LID - S0016-5107(17)32170-3 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.046 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sham procedures in endoscopy are used with the intention of controlling for placebo response, potentially allowing more precise evaluation of treatment effect. Nevertheless, this type of study may impose significant risk without potential benefit for those in the sham group. The aim of the current study was to systematically review and analyze the endoscopic literature to assess the safety of sham controls. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for endoscopic sham procedures for all dates to July 2017. Only randomized controlled trials comparing an endoscopic therapy with a sham were included. Primary outcome was adverse events (AEs) categorized as mild, moderate, or severe. Results were combined using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I(2) statistic, and publication bias was assessed with the Egger test and funnel plots. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 34 publications (1987-2017; 100% full text), with a total of 2492 procedures (1355 treatment/1137 sham). Sham procedures involved upper endoscopy (31 studies) and ERCP (3 studies). Treatment arms included procedures with the following indications: weight loss (38.2%), GI bleeding (26.5%), GERD (20.6%), sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (8.8%), and dysphagia (6.2%). Overall percentage of severe adverse events (SAEs) in the sham group was 1.7% (19/1137). Of these, the most common SAEs in the sham groups were need for surgery/intensive care unit stay (35.3%), post-ERCP pancreatitis (23.5%), and perforation (11.8%). There was no significant difference in the odds of developing an SAE between the treatment group and the sham group (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-2.3). The pooled additional risk incurred from being initially randomized to the sham arm and then receiving a cross-over intervention was significant (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.14-1.56; P < .001), compared with patients initially randomized to the study intervention. CONCLUSION: The frequency of AEs in endoscopic sham procedures is substantial, and patients are subjected to considerable morbidity. These results raise a serious ethical dilemma regarding the use of sham-controlled trials. CI - Copyright (c) 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Schulman, Allison R AU - Schulman AR AD - Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. FAU - Popov, Violeta AU - Popov V AD - New York University, New York, New York, USA. FAU - Thompson, Christopher C AU - Thompson CC AD - Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. LA - eng GR - P30 DK034854/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States GR - T32 DK007533/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States PT - Journal Article PT - Meta-Analysis PT - Review PT - Systematic Review DEP - 20170809 PL - United States TA - Gastrointest Endosc JT - Gastrointestinal endoscopy JID - 0010505 RN - 0 (Placebos) SB - IM CIN - Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jul;88(1):203-204. PMID: 29935620 CIN - Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jul;88(1):204. PMID: 29935622 MH - Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/*adverse effects MH - Critical Care MH - Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/*adverse effects MH - Humans MH - Pancreatitis/etiology MH - Placebos/*adverse effects MH - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/ethics PMC - PMC5693737 MID - NIHMS898764 EDAT- 2017/08/15 06:00 MHDA- 2018/07/28 06:00 PMCR- 2018/12/01 CRDT- 2017/08/14 06:00 PHST- 2017/03/23 00:00 [received] PHST- 2017/07/30 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2017/08/15 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2018/07/28 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2017/08/14 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2018/12/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - S0016-5107(17)32170-3 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.046 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Dec;86(6):972-985.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.046. Epub 2017 Aug 9.