PMID- 28935854 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20180109 LR - 20190609 IS - 1941-5923 (Electronic) IS - 1941-5923 (Linking) VI - 18 DP - 2017 Sep 22 TI - Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Direct Tomotherapy in Bilateral Whole Breast Irradiation in a Case of Bilateral Synchronous Grade 1 and Stage 1 Breast Cancer. PG - 1020-1023 AB - BACKGROUND Synchronous bilateral breast cancer is rare. A case is presented where whole breast irradiation (WBI) was planned after breast conserving surgery in a patient with synchronous bilateral breast cancer. A comparison was made between the feasibility of helical tomotherapy and direct tomotherapy. CASE REPORT A 60-year-old woman was found to have bilateral breast nodules on routine mammographic screening, resulting in bilateral lumpectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Histopathology showed a 6 mm diameter invasive ductal carcinoma in the right breast (Grade 1, hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative) and an 8mm diameter tubular carcinoma in the left breast (Grade 1, hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative). Lymph node biopsy and histology, chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasound scan, and bone scintigraphy were negative for metastases (both tumors were Stage 1). Adjuvant therapy with commenced with anastrozole, but no chemotherapy was given. Clinical target volumes (CTVs) were contoured on computed tomography (CT) images. For planning target volumes (PTVs), CTVs were expanded by 1 cm in all directions, except for the medial 5 mm. Since dose constraints to organs at risk (OARs) were beyond established limits, CTVs were expanded by 5 mm. For PTVs, OAR doses and homogeneity indices for helical tomotherapy and direct tomotherapy were compared. Helical tomotherapy provided better target volume coverage and OAR sparing than direct tomotherapy. CONCLUSIONS In a case of bilateral synchronous Stage 1 and Grade 1 breast cancer, helical tomotherapy appeared more suitable than direct tomotherapy. FAU - Lancellotta, Valentina AU - Lancellotta V AD - Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy. FAU - Iacco, Martina AU - Iacco M AD - Medical Physics Unit, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy. FAU - Perrucci, Elisabetta AU - Perrucci E AD - Radiation Oncology Division, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy. FAU - Zucchetti, Claudio AU - Zucchetti C AD - Medical Physics Unit, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy. FAU - Dipilato, Anna Concetta AU - Dipilato AC AD - Medical Physics Unit, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy. FAU - Falcinelli, Lorenzo AU - Falcinelli L AD - Radiation Oncology Division, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy. FAU - Palumbo, Isabella AU - Palumbo I AD - Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy. FAU - Aristei, Cynthia AU - Aristei C AD - Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy. LA - eng PT - Case Reports PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article DEP - 20170922 PL - United States TA - Am J Case Rep JT - The American journal of case reports JID - 101489566 SB - IM MH - Breast Neoplasms/pathology/*therapy MH - Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology/therapy MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Mastectomy, Segmental MH - Middle Aged MH - Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted MH - Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/*methods MH - *Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated PMC - PMC5627865 COIS- Conflict of interest: None declared Conflict of interest None. EDAT- 2017/09/25 06:00 MHDA- 2018/01/10 06:00 PMCR- 2017/09/22 CRDT- 2017/09/23 06:00 PHST- 2017/09/23 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2017/09/25 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2018/01/10 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2017/09/22 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 905245 [pii] AID - 10.12659/ajcr.905245 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Am J Case Rep. 2017 Sep 22;18:1020-1023. doi: 10.12659/ajcr.905245.