PMID- 28938672 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE DCOM- 20170925 LR - 20231112 IS - 1949-2553 (Electronic) IS - 1949-2553 (Linking) VI - 8 IP - 35 DP - 2017 Aug 29 TI - Comparing the clinical efficacy of abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and orteronel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer by performing a network meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials. PG - 59690-59697 LID - 10.18632/oncotarget.17741 [doi] AB - Various novel androgen receptor (AR) targeting drugs have been developed recently and have shown beneficial effects on survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, no consensus has been reached regarding which of these agents provides the most favorable oncological outcomes. Here, we aimed to compare the efficacy of novel AR-targeted agents by performing a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We included eight RCTs for men with mCRPC treated with one of the AR targeting agents: abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, or orteronel. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responsiveness, time to PSA progression, time to first skeletal-related events (SRE), and adverse events (AEs). Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were conducted to obtain direct and indirect evidence, respectively. Notably, enzalutamide and abiraterone were significantly associated with improved OS compared with control arms. Enzalutamide was ranked as the most efficacious agent for improving OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71), and abiraterone appeared to be the second-most efficacious drug for this purpose (HR = 0.78). Enzalutamide improved PFS in comparison with control groups (HR = 0.36), but abiraterone and orteronel were not significantly associated with PFS improvements. Enzalutamide (HR = 0.20) and abiraterone (HR = 0.56) were significantly associated with prolonged times to PSA progression as compared with control groups. However, only orteronel was associated with an increased risk of AEs as compared with control groups. In summary, our study can help to guide treatment selection, especially because AR-targeted agents have not been compared directly in head-to-head trials. FAU - Kang, Minyong AU - Kang M AD - Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. FAU - Jeong, Chang Wook AU - Jeong CW AD - Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. FAU - Kwak, Cheol AU - Kwak C AD - Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. FAU - Ku, Ja Hyeon AU - Ku JH AD - Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. FAU - Kim, Hyeon Hoe AU - Kim HH AD - Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20170510 PL - United States TA - Oncotarget JT - Oncotarget JID - 101532965 PMC - PMC5601768 OTO - NOTNLM OT - androgen receptor signaling OT - castration-resistant prostate cancer OT - network meta-analysis OT - systematic review OT - targeted drug COIS- CONFLICTS OF INTEREST None declared. EDAT- 2017/09/25 06:00 MHDA- 2017/09/25 06:01 PMCR- 2017/08/29 CRDT- 2017/09/24 06:00 PHST- 2017/02/27 00:00 [received] PHST- 2017/04/25 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2017/09/24 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2017/09/25 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2017/09/25 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2017/08/29 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 17741 [pii] AID - 10.18632/oncotarget.17741 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Oncotarget. 2017 May 10;8(35):59690-59697. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17741. eCollection 2017 Aug 29.