PMID- 29020054 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20171030 LR - 20181113 IS - 1932-6203 (Electronic) IS - 1932-6203 (Linking) VI - 12 IP - 10 DP - 2017 TI - A novel approach for automatic visualization and activation detection of evoked potentials induced by epidural spinal cord stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injury. PG - e0185582 LID - 10.1371/journal.pone.0185582 [doi] LID - e0185582 AB - Voluntary movements and the standing of spinal cord injured patients have been facilitated using lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES). Identifying the appropriate stimulation parameters (intensity, frequency and anode/cathode assignment) is an arduous task and requires extensive mapping of the spinal cord using evoked potentials. Effective visualization and detection of muscle evoked potentials induced by scES from the recorded electromyography (EMG) signals is critical to identify the optimal configurations and the effects of specific scES parameters on muscle activation. The purpose of this work was to develop a novel approach to automatically detect the occurrence of evoked potentials, quantify the attributes of the signal and visualize the effects across a high number of scES parameters. This new method is designed to automate the current process for performing this task, which has been accomplished manually by data analysts through observation of raw EMG signals, a process that is laborious and time-consuming as well as prone to human errors. The proposed method provides a fast and accurate five-step algorithms framework for activation detection and visualization of the results including: conversion of the EMG signal into its 2-D representation by overlaying the located signal building blocks; de-noising the 2-D image by applying the Generalized Gaussian Markov Random Field technique; detection of the occurrence of evoked potentials using a statistically optimal decision method through the comparison of the probability density functions of each segment to the background noise utilizing log-likelihood ratio; feature extraction of detected motor units such as peak-to-peak amplitude, latency, integrated EMG and Min-max time intervals; and finally visualization of the outputs as Colormap images. In comparing the automatic method vs. manual detection on 700 EMG signals from five individuals, the new approach decreased the processing time from several hours to less than 15 seconds for each set of data, and demonstrated an average accuracy of 98.28% based on the combined false positive and false negative error rates. The sensitivity of this method to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was tested using simulated EMG signals and compared to two existing methods, where the novel technique showed much lower sensitivity to the SNR. FAU - Mesbah, Samineh AU - Mesbah S AD - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America. AD - Department of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America. AD - Frazier Rehab Institute, Kentucky One Health, Louisville, KY, United States of America. FAU - Angeli, Claudia A AU - Angeli CA AD - Frazier Rehab Institute, Kentucky One Health, Louisville, KY, United States of America. AD - Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America. AD - Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America. FAU - Keynton, Robert S AU - Keynton RS AD - Department of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America. FAU - El-Baz, Ayman AU - El-Baz A AUID- ORCID: 0000-0001-7264-1323 AD - Department of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America. FAU - Harkema, Susan J AU - Harkema SJ AD - Frazier Rehab Institute, Kentucky One Health, Louisville, KY, United States of America. AD - Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America. AD - Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America. LA - eng PT - Clinical Trial PT - Journal Article DEP - 20171011 PL - United States TA - PLoS One JT - PloS one JID - 101285081 SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Algorithms MH - Artifacts MH - Automation MH - Electric Stimulation MH - *Electric Stimulation Therapy MH - Electromyography/*methods MH - Epidural Space/*physiopathology MH - Evoked Potentials/*physiology MH - Humans MH - Imaging, Three-Dimensional MH - Male MH - Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted MH - Signal-To-Noise Ratio MH - Spinal Cord Injuries/*physiopathology/*therapy MH - Time Factors PMC - PMC5636093 COIS- Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. EDAT- 2017/10/12 06:00 MHDA- 2017/10/31 06:00 PMCR- 2017/10/11 CRDT- 2017/10/12 06:00 PHST- 2016/12/15 00:00 [received] PHST- 2017/09/16 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2017/10/12 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2017/10/12 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2017/10/31 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2017/10/11 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - PONE-D-16-49649 [pii] AID - 10.1371/journal.pone.0185582 [doi] PST - epublish SO - PLoS One. 2017 Oct 11;12(10):e0185582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185582. eCollection 2017.