PMID- 29297139 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20180828 LR - 20191210 IS - 1865-0341 (Electronic) IS - 1865-0333 (Linking) VI - 11 IP - 1 DP - 2018 Mar TI - Comparative evaluation of image quality among different detector configurations using area detector computed tomography. PG - 54-60 LID - 10.1007/s12194-017-0437-y [doi] AB - The 320-detector row computed tomography (CT) system, i.e., the area detector CT (ADCT), can perform helical scanning with detector configurations of 4-, 16-, 32-, 64-, 80-, 100-, and 160-detector rows for routine CT examinations. This phantom study aimed to compare the quality of images obtained using helical scan mode with different detector configurations. The image quality was measured using modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise power spectrum (NPS). The system performance function (SP), based on the pre-whitening theorem, was calculated as MTF(2)/NPS, and compared between configurations. Five detector configurations, i.e., 0.5 x 16 mm (16 row), 0.5 x 64 mm (64 row), 0.5 x 80 mm (80 row), 0.5 x 100 mm (100 row), and 0.5 x 160 mm (160 row), were compared using a constant volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) of 25 mGy, simulating the scan of an adult abdomen, and with a constant effective mAs value. The MTF was measured using the wire method, and the NPS was measured from images of a 20-cm diameter phantom with uniform content. The SP of 80-row configuration was the best, for the constant CTDI(vol), followed by the 64-, 160-, 16-, and 100-row configurations. The decrease in the rate of the 100- and 160-row configurations from the 80-row configuration was approximately 30%. For the constant effective mAs, the SPs of the 100-row and 160-row configurations were significantly lower, compared with the other three detector configurations. The 80- and 64-row configurations were adequate in cases that required dose efficiency rather than scan speed. FAU - Miura, Yohei AU - Miura Y AD - Department of Medical Technology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan. AD - Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan. FAU - Ichikawa, Katsuhiro AU - Ichikawa K AD - Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-0942, Japan. ichikawa@mhs.mp.kanazawa-u.ac.jp. FAU - Fujimura, Ichiro AU - Fujimura I AD - Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan. AD - Department of Radiological Technology, Rinku General Medical Center, Izumisano, Japan. FAU - Hara, Takanori AU - Hara T AD - Department of Medical Technology, Nakatsugawa Municipal General Hospital, Nakatsugawa, Japan. FAU - Hoshino, Takashi AU - Hoshino T AD - Department of Radiology, Ishinkai Yao General Hospital, Yao, Japan. FAU - Niwa, Shinji AU - Niwa S AD - Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan. AD - Department of Medical Technology, Nakatsugawa Municipal General Hospital, Nakatsugawa, Japan. FAU - Funahashi, Masao AU - Funahashi M AD - Department of Medical Technology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan. LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Evaluation Study PT - Journal Article DEP - 20180102 PL - Japan TA - Radiol Phys Technol JT - Radiological physics and technology JID - 101467995 SB - IM MH - Humans MH - Image Enhancement/*standards MH - *Phantoms, Imaging MH - Radiation Dosage MH - Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/*standards MH - Radiography, Abdominal/methods/*standards MH - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*instrumentation/methods/*standards OTO - NOTNLM OT - Computed tomography OT - Detector configurations OT - Helical scan OT - Image quality OT - System performance function OT - Volume CT dose index EDAT- 2018/01/04 06:00 MHDA- 2018/08/29 06:00 CRDT- 2018/01/04 06:00 PHST- 2017/09/22 00:00 [received] PHST- 2017/12/15 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2017/12/10 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2018/01/04 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2018/08/29 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2018/01/04 06:00 [entrez] AID - 10.1007/s12194-017-0437-y [pii] AID - 10.1007/s12194-017-0437-y [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Radiol Phys Technol. 2018 Mar;11(1):54-60. doi: 10.1007/s12194-017-0437-y. Epub 2018 Jan 2.