PMID- 29389309 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20181127 LR - 20181127 IS - 1840-4812 (Electronic) IS - 1512-8601 (Print) IS - 1512-8601 (Linking) VI - 18 IP - 2 DP - 2018 May 20 TI - Standardization and optimization of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER-2 assessment in breast cancer: A single center experience. PG - 132-140 LID - 10.17305/bjbms.2018.2519 [doi] AB - Accurate assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) is crucial in selecting patients for targeted therapy. Commonly used methods for HER-2 testing are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Here we presented the implementation, optimization and standardization of two FISH protocols using breast cancer samples and assessed the impact of pre-analytical and analytical factors on HER-2 testing. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples from 70 breast cancer patients were tested for HER-2 using PathVysion HER-2 DNA Probe Kit and two different paraffin pretreatment kits, Vysis/Abbott Paraffin Pretreatment Reagent Kit (40 samples) and DAKO Histology FISH Accessory Kit (30 samples). The concordance between FISH and IHC results was determined. Pre-analytical and analytical factors (i.e., fixation, baking, digestion, and post-hybridization washing) affected the efficiency and quality of hybridization. The overall hybridization success in our study was 98.6% (69/70); the failure rate was 1.4%. The DAKO pretreatment kit was more time-efficient and resulted in more uniform signals that were easier to interpret, compared to the Vysis/Abbott kit. The overall concordance between IHC and FISH was 84.06%, kappa coefficient 0.5976 (p < 0.0001). The greatest discordance (82%) between IHC and FISH was observed in IHC 2+ group. A standardized FISH protocol for HER-2 assessment, with high hybridization efficiency, is necessary due to variability in tissue processing and individual tissue characteristics. Differences in the pre-analytical and analytical steps can affect the hybridization quality and efficiency. The use of DAKO pretreatment kit is time-saving and cost-effective. FAU - Bogdanovska-Todorovska, Magdalena AU - Bogdanovska-Todorovska M AD - Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. magde__b981@yahoo.com. FAU - Petrushevska, Gordana AU - Petrushevska G FAU - Janevska, Vesna AU - Janevska V FAU - Spasevska, Liljana AU - Spasevska L FAU - Kostadinova-Kunovska, Slavica AU - Kostadinova-Kunovska S LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article DEP - 20180520 PL - Bosnia and Herzegovina TA - Bosn J Basic Med Sci JT - Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences JID - 101200947 RN - EC 2.7.10.1 (ERBB2 protein, human) RN - EC 2.7.10.1 (Receptor, ErbB-2) SB - IM MH - Breast Neoplasms/*genetics MH - Female MH - Gene Amplification MH - Humans MH - *Immunohistochemistry MH - In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/*instrumentation/*methods MH - Nucleic Acid Hybridization MH - Paraffin Embedding MH - Receptor, ErbB-2/*genetics MH - Reproducibility of Results PMC - PMC5988532 EDAT- 2018/02/02 06:00 MHDA- 2018/11/28 06:00 PMCR- 2018/05/01 CRDT- 2018/02/02 06:00 PHST- 2017/09/30 00:00 [received] PHST- 2017/11/14 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2017/11/13 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2018/02/02 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2018/11/28 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2018/02/02 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2018/05/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - BJBMS-18-132 [pii] AID - 10.17305/bjbms.2018.2519 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2018 May 20;18(2):132-140. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2018.2519.