PMID- 29668619 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20180424 LR - 20210109 IS - 1536-5964 (Electronic) IS - 0025-7974 (Print) IS - 0025-7974 (Linking) VI - 97 IP - 16 DP - 2018 Apr TI - Gefitinib provides similar effectiveness and improved safety than erlotinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. PG - e0460 LID - 10.1097/MD.0000000000010460 [doi] LID - e0460 AB - BACKGROUND: The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib are effective for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This meta-analysis compared their effectiveness and safety. METHODS: We searched systematically in PubMed, ScienceDirect, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for relevant clinical trials regarding gefitinib versus erlotinib for NSCLC. Antitumor effectiveness (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], objective response rate [ORR] and disease control rate [DCR]) and adverse effects [AEs]) were assessed. RESULTS: Forty studies comprising 9376 participants were included. The results suggested that gefitinib and erlotinib are effective for advanced NSCLC with comparable PFS (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.98-1.11, P = .15), OS (95% CI: 0.93-1.19, P = .45), ORR (95% CI: 0.99-1.16, P = .07), and DCR (95% CI: 0.92-1.03, P = .35). For erlotinib, dose reduction was significantly more frequent (95% CI: 0.10-0.57, P = .001) as were grade 3 to 5 AEs (95% CI: 0.36-0.79, P = .002). In the subgroup analysis, the erlotinib group had a significant higher rate and severity of skin rash, nausea/vomiting, fatigue, and stomatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Gefitinib was proven to be the better choice for advanced NSCLC, with equal antitumor effectiveness and fewer AEs compared with erlotinib. Further large-scale, well-designed randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our validation. FAU - Zhang, Wenxiong AU - Zhang W AD - Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Ssecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China. FAU - Wei, Yiping AU - Wei Y FAU - Yu, Dongliang AU - Yu D FAU - Xu, Jianjun AU - Xu J FAU - Peng, Jinhua AU - Peng J LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Meta-Analysis PL - United States TA - Medicine (Baltimore) JT - Medicine JID - 2985248R RN - 0 (Protein Kinase Inhibitors) RN - 0 (Quinazolines) RN - DA87705X9K (Erlotinib Hydrochloride) RN - EC 2.7.10.1 (ErbB Receptors) RN - S65743JHBS (Gefitinib) SB - IM MH - *Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy/pathology MH - Comparative Effectiveness Research MH - ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors MH - Erlotinib Hydrochloride/*pharmacology MH - Gefitinib MH - Humans MH - *Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy/pathology MH - Neoplasm Staging MH - Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology MH - Quinazolines/*pharmacology PMC - PMC5916648 COIS- The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. EDAT- 2018/04/19 06:00 MHDA- 2018/04/25 06:00 PMCR- 2018/04/20 CRDT- 2018/04/19 06:00 PHST- 2018/04/19 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2018/04/19 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2018/04/25 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2018/04/20 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 00005792-201804200-00045 [pii] AID - MD D-17-06637 [pii] AID - 10.1097/MD.0000000000010460 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(16):e0460. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010460.