PMID- 29723318
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20180813
LR  - 20181023
IS  - 0893-2174 (Print)
IS  - 0893-2174 (Linking)
VI  - 31
IP  - 3
DP  - 2018 May/Jun
TI  - Do Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Color-Vision Deficiencies Influence 
      Shade-Matching Ability?
PG  - 239-247
LID - 10.11607/ijp.5563 [doi]
AB  - PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of color-vision deficiencies and type 1 diabetes 
      mellitus (DM) on visual shade-matching ability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four 
      groups of participants were investigated: a control group (n = 68); a group with 
      protanomalia (n = 10); a group with deuteranomalia (n = 19); and a group with 
      type 1 DM (n = 13). Color vision was evaluated monocularly using the Ishihara 
      test, Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue (FM100H) test, Hardy Rand Rittler (HRR) test, 
      and with an HMC Anomaloskop MR (Rayleigh and Moreland tests). The final exam was 
      on a Toothguide Training Box (TTB) and consisted of 15 lightness-chroma-hue 
      tasks. The color difference (DeltaE*(ab)) and the shade-matching score (SigmaDeltaE*(ab)) 
      were computed, and the correct lightness (L*), chroma (C*), and hue (h*) 
      selections were counted. The means and standard deviations for the SigmaDeltaE*(ab), 
      DeltaE*(ab), L*, C*, h*, Ishihara, HRR, FM100H, and Rayleigh and Moreland tests were 
      calculated. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Bonferroni test 
      were used for statistical analyses and a comparison of means (alpha = .05). The data 
      analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 for Windows (IBM). RESULTS: The control 
      group selected the shade tab on the TTB significantly better (SigmaDeltaE*(ab) = 31.57 +/- 
      13.50) than the group with protanomalia (SigmaDeltaE*(ab) = 55.50 +/- 12.36; P < .0001) and 
      the group with deuteranomalia (SigmaDeltaE*(ab) = 59.18 +/- 16.35; P < .0001), but not 
      significantly better than the group with type 1 DM (SigmaDeltaE*(ab) = 39.43 +/- 11.46; P = 
      .368). The group with type 1 DM selected the shade tab on the TTB significantly 
      better than the group with protanomalia (P = .038) and the group with 
      deuteranomalia (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Participants with color-vision 
      deficiencies are less accurate at shade matching than the control group and the 
      group with type 1 DM.
FAU - Pohlen, Bostjan
AU  - Pohlen B
FAU - Hawlina, Marko
AU  - Hawlina M
FAU - Pompe, Manca Tekavcic
AU  - Pompe MT
FAU - Kopac, Igor
AU  - Kopac I
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
PL  - United States
TA  - Int J Prosthodont
JT  - The International journal of prosthodontics
JID - 8900938
MH  - *Color Vision Defects/physiopathology
MH  - *Dental Prosthesis Design
MH  - *Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/physiopathology
MH  - Humans
MH  - *Prosthesis Coloring
EDAT- 2018/05/04 06:00
MHDA- 2018/08/14 06:00
CRDT- 2018/05/04 06:00
PHST- 2018/05/04 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2018/05/04 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2018/08/14 06:00 [medline]
AID - 10.11607/ijp.5563 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Int J Prosthodont. 2018 May/Jun;31(3):239-247. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5563.