PMID- 29756969
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20181022
LR  - 20191210
IS  - 1699-5198 (Electronic)
IS  - 0212-1611 (Linking)
VI  - 35
IP  - 2
DP  - 2018 Feb 16
TI  - [Validation of nutritional screening Malnutrition Screening Tool compared to 
      other screening tools and the nutritional assessment in different social and 
      health areas].
PG  - 351-358
LID - 10.20960/nh.1619 [doi]
AB  - INTRODUCTION: nutritional screenings are used to detect nutritional risk, allow 
      early intervention and influence the prognosis. The Malnutrition Screening Tool 
      (MST) is only validated in hospitalized patients and oncology outpatients. 
      OBJECTIVES: to analyze the nutritional screening MST, Malnutrition Universal 
      Screening Tool (MUST) and Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-sf) 
      compared to the nutritional assessment gold standard according to socio-sanitary 
      areas and age groups; and to assess the utility of the MST in those areas where 
      it has not been validated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a total of 815 outpatient, 
      hospitalized and institutionalized subjects were included in this study. MUST and 
      MST screenings, and nutritional assessment were performed in all subjects. MNA-sf 
      was also performed in subjects >/= 65 years of age. Nutritional diagnosis was 
      performed according to the SENPE-SEDOM consensus. RESULTS: in the outpatient 
      cohort, three screenings have a validity (AUC ROC) greater than 0.8 compared to 
      nutritional assessment. In the institutionalized, the MNA-sf generates false 
      positives and the MUST is more valid than MST (AUC ROC = 0.815 and 0.763, 
      respectively). In hospitalized patients, there are excellent results with MUST 
      and MST. In all socio-sanitary areas the MST obtains a better positive predictive 
      value. By age groups, MUST and MST are valid tools. CONCLUSIONS: in our study, 
      the MST correctly diagnoses more than 80% of the patients (S = 69.4%, E = 94.2%), 
      and has a good reliability and validity with respect to nutritional assessment 
      not only in hospitalized patients and oncology outpatients, where it has already 
      been validated. In our population, the MST was found to be valid in outpatient, 
      institutionalized and hospitalized subjects.
FAU - Castro-Vega, Iciar
AU  - Castro-Vega I
AD  - Seccion de Endocrinologia y Nutricion, Hospital Universitario Dr Peset - 
      Fundacion para el Fomento de la Investigacion Sanitaria y Biomedica de la 
      Comunidad Valenciana, Valencia, Espana. iciarcv@gmail.com.
FAU - Veses Martin, Silvia
AU  - Veses Martin S
FAU - Cantero Llorca, Juana
AU  - Cantero Llorca J
FAU - Salom Vendrell, Christian
AU  - Salom Vendrell C
FAU - Banuls, Celia
AU  - Banuls C
FAU - Hernandez Mijares, Antonio
AU  - Hernandez Mijares A
LA  - spa
PT  - Journal Article
PT  - Validation Study
TT  - Validacion del cribado nutricional Malnutrition Screening Tool comparado con la 
      valoracion nutricional completa y otros cribados en distintos ambitos 
      sociosanitarios.
DEP - 20180216
PL  - Spain
TA  - Nutr Hosp
JT  - Nutricion hospitalaria
JID - 9100365
SB  - IM
MH  - Adult
MH  - Aged
MH  - Aged, 80 and over
MH  - Cohort Studies
MH  - Female
MH  - Hospitalization
MH  - Humans
MH  - Male
MH  - Malnutrition/*diagnosis
MH  - Middle Aged
MH  - Neoplasms/complications
MH  - *Nutrition Assessment
MH  - Outpatients
MH  - Reproducibility of Results
EDAT- 2018/05/15 06:00
MHDA- 2018/10/23 06:00
CRDT- 2018/05/15 06:00
PHST- 2017/10/05 00:00 [received]
PHST- 2017/10/18 00:00 [accepted]
PHST- 2018/05/15 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2018/05/15 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2018/10/23 06:00 [medline]
AID - 10.20960/nh.1619 [doi]
PST - epublish
SO  - Nutr Hosp. 2018 Feb 16;35(2):351-358. doi: 10.20960/nh.1619.