PMID- 29906733 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE DCOM- 20180724 LR - 20180724 IS - 1879-1026 (Electronic) IS - 0048-9697 (Linking) VI - 642 DP - 2018 Nov 15 TI - Monitoring ecosystem reclamation recovery using optical remote sensing: Comparison with field measurements and eddy covariance. PG - 436-446 LID - S0048-9697(18)32101-6 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.039 [doi] AB - Time series remote sensing vegetation indices derived from SPOT 5 data are compared with vegetation structure and eddy covariance flux data at 15 dry to wet reclamation and reference sites within the Oil Sands region of Alberta, Canada. This comprehensive analysis examines the linkages between indicators of ecosystem function and change trajectories observed both at the plot level and within pixels. Using SPOT imagery, we find that higher spatial resolution datasets (e.g. 10 m) improves the relationship between vegetation indices and structural measurements compared with interpolated (lower resolution) pixels. The simple ratio (SR) vegetation index performs best when compared with stem density-based indicators (R(2) = 0.65; p < 0.00), while the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) and soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) are most comparable to foliage indicators (leaf area index (LAI) and canopy cover (R(2) = 0.52-0.78; p > 0.02). Fluxes (net ecosystem production (NEP) and gross ecosystem production (GEP)) are most related to NDVI and SAVI when these are interpolated to larger 20 m x 20 m pixels (R(2) = 0.44-0.50; p < 0.00). As expected, decreased sensitivity of NDVI is problematic for sites with LAI > 3 m(2) m(-2), making this index more appropriate for newly regenerating reclamation areas. For sites with LAI < 3 m(2) m(-2), trajectories of vegetation change can be mapped over time and are within 2.7% and 3.3% of annual measured LAI changes observed at most sites. This study demonstrates the utility of remote sensing in combination with field and eddy covariance data for monitoring and scaling of reclaimed and reference site productivity within and beyond the Oil Sands Region of western Canada. CI - Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. FAU - Chasmer, L AU - Chasmer L AD - Dept. of Geography, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada. Electronic address: laura.chasmer@uleth.ca. FAU - Baker, T AU - Baker T AD - Integral Ecology Group, Duncan, British Columbia V9L 6H1, Canada. FAU - Carey, S K AU - Carey SK AD - School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada. FAU - Straker, J AU - Straker J AD - Integral Ecology Group, Duncan, British Columbia V9L 6H1, Canada. FAU - Strilesky, S AU - Strilesky S AD - Dept. of Geography, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada. FAU - Petrone, R AU - Petrone R AD - Dept. of Geography & Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20180614 PL - Netherlands TA - Sci Total Environ JT - The Science of the total environment JID - 0330500 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Biomass OT - LAI OT - Net ecosystem exchange OT - Oil sands reclamation OT - Remote sensing OT - Trajectory EDAT- 2018/06/16 06:00 MHDA- 2018/06/16 06:01 CRDT- 2018/06/16 06:00 PHST- 2018/03/13 00:00 [received] PHST- 2018/06/04 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2018/06/04 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2018/06/16 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2018/06/16 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2018/06/16 06:00 [entrez] AID - S0048-9697(18)32101-6 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.039 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Sci Total Environ. 2018 Nov 15;642:436-446. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.039. Epub 2018 Jun 14.