PMID- 29913660 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20220311 IS - 1877-8879 (Electronic) IS - 1877-8860 (Linking) VI - 5 IP - 1 DP - 2014 Jan 1 TI - Reliability and responsiveness of the Norwegian version of the Neck Disability Index. PG - 28-33 LID - /j/sjpain.2014.5.issue-1/j.sjpain.2013.10.001/j.sjpain.2013.10.001.xml [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.sjpain.2013.10.001 [doi] AB - Background and aim The Norwegian version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) has been widely used in previous studies. To our knowledge, the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the NDI have not been investigated. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the Norwegian version of the NDI in neck pain patients seen in a specialized outpatient clinic. Methods This study included patients referred to the neck and back outpatient clinic at Oslo University Hospital. A total of 255 patients were included in the study, of which 42 participated in the test-retest portion of the study. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reliability. A total of 113 patients participated in the responsiveness analyses. Based on their responses on the Global Rating Scale of Change (GRS), patients were categorized into the following groups: worsened (n = 24), unchanged (n = 7) and improved (n = 62). The minimal detectable change (MDC) for the NDI was calculated. Responsiveness was assessed by constructing a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC curve) to distinguish patients who had improved or worsened from those who remained unchanged. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was estimated. Results The test-retest reliability between the baseline scores and the retest NDI scores was very good (ICC = 0.84; 95% CI 0.72-0.91). The ability of the NDI to discriminate between improved and unchanged patients (responsiveness) over time was acceptable based on the ROC curve analysis (AUC = 0.70; 95% CI 0.58-0.82). The estimated MDC for the Norwegian version of the NDI is 12.3%, and the MCID is 16.6%. Conclusion The Norwegian version of the NDI proved to be an instrument with good test-retest reliability and acceptable responsiveness for assessing neck pain-related disability among neck pain patients in a specialized outpatient clinic. FAU - Johansen, Jan Borre AU - Johansen JB AD - Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. FAU - Roe, Cecilie AU - Roe C AD - Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. AD - Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. FAU - Bakke, Eva AU - Bakke E AD - Department of Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. FAU - Mengshoel, Anne Marit AU - Mengshoel AM AD - Department of Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. FAU - Andelic, Nada AU - Andelic N AD - Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20140101 PL - Germany TA - Scand J Pain JT - Scandinavian journal of pain JID - 101520867 OTO - NOTNLM OT - NDI OT - Neck pain OT - Responsiveness OT - Test-retest reliability OT - Validity EDAT- 2018/06/20 06:00 MHDA- 2018/06/20 06:01 CRDT- 2018/06/20 06:00 PHST- 2013/05/23 00:00 [received] PHST- 2013/10/17 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2018/06/20 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2018/06/20 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2018/06/20 06:01 [medline] AID - /j/sjpain.2014.5.issue-1/j.sjpain.2013.10.001/j.sjpain.2013.10.001.xml [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.sjpain.2013.10.001 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Scand J Pain. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2013.10.001.