PMID- 29927468 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20190314 LR - 20190314 IS - 2325-8179 (Electronic) IS - 2325-8160 (Linking) VI - 49 IP - 6 DP - 2018 Jun 1 TI - Reproducibility of Macular Thickness Measurements in Eyes Affected by Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration From Two Different SD-OCT Instruments. PG - 410-415 LID - 10.3928/23258160-20180601-05 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare macular thickness measurement algorithms of two different spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) devices in eyes affected by dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with dry AMD and healthy volunteers from the retina clinic of the Doheny Eye Center - UCLA were imaged using two different SD-OCT devices: the RS-3000 Advance (Nidek, Padova, Italy) and the Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). All patients had been previously diagnosed with drusen or geographic atrophy due to AMD. The commercial instrument software was used to generate the macular retinal thickness measurements, and measurements were compared between devices. RESULTS: Eighty-five diseased eyes from 49 patients and 16 healthy control eyes from eight normal volunteers were included in this study. The macular thickness measurements generated by the two instruments in eyes with AMD differed significantly in mean retinal thickness in the foveal center subfield (257.34 mum +/- 51.72 mum using the Nidek OCT vs. 238.20 mum +/- 51.89 mum using the Cirrus OCT; P < .001). The mean difference in macular thickness between the two devices was 19.14 mum +/- 5.84 mum for diseased eyes and 17.06 mum +/- 5.28 mum in normal control eyes, and this was not statistically different between the two groups (P > .05). The macular thickness measurements in diseased eyes, as evaluated by the two different instruments, however, showed excellent correlation (r = 0.99; P < .001), with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.98-0.99). Post hoc evaluation of cases with larger differences also showed differences in foveal center selection and variabilities in boundary selection with specific pathology. CONCLUSION: Macular thickness measurements provided by the Nidek and Cirrus OCT instruments in eyes with dry AMD are highly correlated but show a consistent difference, which may allow the use of a standard correction factor to be applied to better interrelate measurements between the devices. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:410-415.]. CI - Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated. FAU - Tepelus, Tudor C AU - Tepelus TC FAU - Hariri, Amir H AU - Hariri AH FAU - Balasubramanian, Siva AU - Balasubramanian S FAU - Sadda, SriniVas R AU - Sadda SR LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - United States TA - Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina JT - Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina JID - 101599215 SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Aged, 80 and over MH - Case-Control Studies MH - Female MH - Geographic Atrophy/pathology MH - Humans MH - Macula Lutea/*pathology MH - Macular Degeneration/*pathology MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Reproducibility of Results MH - Tomography, Optical Coherence/*methods MH - Young Adult EDAT- 2018/06/22 06:00 MHDA- 2019/03/15 06:00 CRDT- 2018/06/22 06:00 PHST- 2017/07/06 00:00 [received] PHST- 2017/11/02 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2018/06/22 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2018/06/22 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2019/03/15 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.3928/23258160-20180601-05 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018 Jun 1;49(6):410-415. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20180601-05.