PMID- 29955380 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20220321 IS - 2056-5933 (Print) IS - 2056-5933 (Electronic) IS - 2056-5933 (Linking) VI - 4 IP - 1 DP - 2018 TI - Impact of tocilizumab administered intravenously or subcutaneously on patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PG - e000602 LID - 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000602 [doi] LID - e000602 AB - OBJECTIVE: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown tocilizumab (TCZ) administered intravenously or subcutaneously with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) to be superior to csDMARDs alone for improving rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. This study evaluated the effect of TCZ-intravenous and TCZ-subcutaneous on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in three RCT populations. METHODS: OPTION (NCT00106548), BREVACTA (NCT01232569) and SUMMACTA (NCT01194414) were independent RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of TCZ-intravenous and/or TCZ-subcutaneous with csDMARDs in patients with RA. PROs included patient global assessment, pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and Short Form-36. Study outcomes included the proportions of patients reporting changes from baseline in PRO scores >/= minimum clinically important differences (MCID) and scores >/= age and gender-matched normative values. RESULTS: In OPTION, more patients who received TCZ-intravenous reported improvements in PROs >/=MCID (50%-82% vs 31%-57%) and scores >/= normative values (16%-44% vs 5%-28%) at week 16 compared with placebo. Similarly, a greater proportion of patients in BREVACTA who received TCZ-subcutaneous reported improvements >/= MCID (54%-73% vs 42%-55%) and scores >/= normative values (8%-34% vs 4%-25%) at week 12 compared with placebo. In SUMMACTA, 61%-84% of patients who received TCZ-subcutaneous and 64%-84% of those who received TCZ-intravenous reported improvements >/= MCID and 14%-41% and 15%-24%, respectively, scores >/= normative values at week 24. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ-intravenous or TCZ-subcutaneous with csDMARDs resulted in more patients reporting clinically meaningful improvements and PRO scores >/= normative values compared with placebo. These improvements were similar with TCZ-intravenous and TCZ-subcutaneous. FAU - Strand, Vibeke AU - Strand V AD - Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University Medical School, Palo Alto, California, USA. FAU - Michalska, Margaret AU - Michalska M AD - US Medical Affairs, Genentech, South San Francisco, California, USA. FAU - Birchwood, Christine AU - Birchwood C AD - US Medical Affairs, Genentech, South San Francisco, California, USA. FAU - Pei, Jinglan AU - Pei J AD - US Medical Affairs, Genentech, South San Francisco, California, USA. FAU - Tuckwell, Katie AU - Tuckwell K AD - US Medical Affairs, Genentech, South San Francisco, California, USA. FAU - Finch, Rebecca AU - Finch R AD - PDBB-Biostatistics, Roche, Welwyn Garden City, UK. FAU - Kivitz, Alan J AU - Kivitz AJ AD - Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, Pennsylvania, USA. FAU - Smolen, Josef S AU - Smolen JS AD - Division of Rheumatology and Department of Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. FAU - Burmester, Gerd R AU - Burmester GR AD - Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charite-Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Free University and Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20180617 PL - England TA - RMD Open JT - RMD open JID - 101662038 PMC - PMC6018870 OTO - NOTNLM OT - biologic therapy OT - patient-reported outcomes OT - rheumatoid arthritis OT - tocilizumab COIS- Competing interests: VS has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Crescendo Bioscience, F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech, GSK, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung, Sanofi and UCB. MM, CB, JP and KT are employees of Genentech. RF is an employee and shareholder of F Hoffmann-La Roche. AJK has received consulting fees from Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Regeneron and UCB; JSS has received grants from AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer and Roche and has provided expert advice to and/or had speaking engagements for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro, Celgene, Celtrion, GlaxoSmithKline, ILTOO, Janssen, Lilly, MedImmune, MSD, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi and UCB. GRB has received grants and honoraria for consulting and lectures from Roche. EDAT- 2018/06/30 06:00 MHDA- 2018/06/30 06:01 PMCR- 2018/06/17 CRDT- 2018/06/30 06:00 PHST- 2017/10/17 00:00 [received] PHST- 2018/02/01 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2018/03/20 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2018/06/30 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2018/06/30 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2018/06/30 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2018/06/17 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - rmdopen-2017-000602 [pii] AID - 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000602 [doi] PST - epublish SO - RMD Open. 2018 Jun 17;4(1):e000602. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000602. eCollection 2018.