PMID- 29971182
OWN - NLM
STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE
LR  - 20230926
IS  - 2149-9322 (Print)
IS  - 2149-9330 (Electronic)
IS  - 2149-9330 (Linking)
VI  - 15
IP  - 2
DP  - 2018 Jun
TI  - Evaluation of the diabetes in pregnancy study group of India criteria and 
      Carpenter-Coustan criteria in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus.
PG  - 75-79
LID - 10.4274/tjod.57255 [doi]
AB  - OBJECTIVE: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as any degree of 
      glucose intolerance that is diagnosed for the first time during pregnancy. This 
      prospective study was undertaken to validate the single-step non-fasting 75 gm 
      Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) criteria of GDM in Indian 
      patients in comparison with the two-step fasting 100 gm glucose challenge through 
      the Carpenter Coustan criteria (CCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients 
      underwent comparative testing using the DIPSI criteria and CCC. Plasma venous 
      blood glucose levels were estimated using the hexokinase method; values >/=140 
      mg/dL at 2 hours were considered positive according to the DIPSI criteria. Any 
      two values from >/=95 mg/dL for fasting, >/=180 mg/dL at 1 hour, >/=155 mg/dL at 2 
      hours, and >/=140 mg/dL at 3 hours were considered positive with the CCC. RESULTS: 
      The mean age and body mass index were 24.26+/-3.75 years and 20.7+/-3.07 kg/m2. The 
      sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the 
      DIPSI guidelines were found as 100%, 97.14%, 83.87%, and 100%, respectively. The 
      positive and negative likelihood ratios were 35.8 and zero. Diagnostic accuracy 
      was found as 97.56%. CONCLUSION: DIPSI having high sensitivity, specificity, 
      negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy. DIPSI offers simplicity, 
      feasibility, convenience, and repeatability while economizing universal screening 
      and diagnosis of GDM on a mass-scale. The DIPSI procedure has the potential to be 
      applied to the entire obstetric population, in the implementation of public 
      health programs to diagnose GDM in the community, thus reaching the needs of the 
      developing world.
FAU - Khan, Shazia
AU  - Khan S
AUID- ORCID: 0000-0001-6284-4311
AD  - INHS Kalyani Hospital, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Visakhapatnam, India.
FAU - Bal, Himadri
AU  - Bal H
AUID- ORCID: 0000-0003-4237-5735
AD  - Dr. DY. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Clinic of Obstetrics 
      and Gynecology, Pune, India.
FAU - Khan, Inam Danish
AU  - Khan ID
AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-9824-8711
AD  - Army College of Medical Sciences and Base Hospital, Clinic of Microbiology, New 
      Delhi, India.
FAU - Paul, Debashish
AU  - Paul D
AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-6619-0199
AD  - Armed Forces Medical College, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pune, India.
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
DEP - 20180621
PL  - Turkey
TA  - Turk J Obstet Gynecol
JT  - Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology
JID - 101656661
PMC - PMC6022420
OTO - NOTNLM
OT  - Carpenter Coustan criteria
OT  - Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India criteria
OT  - Gestational diabetes mellitus
OT  - glucose tolerance test
OT  - pregnancy
COIS- Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
EDAT- 2018/07/05 06:00
MHDA- 2018/07/05 06:01
PMCR- 2018/06/01
CRDT- 2018/07/05 06:00
PHST- 2018/01/15 00:00 [received]
PHST- 2018/03/18 00:00 [accepted]
PHST- 2018/07/05 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2018/07/05 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2018/07/05 06:01 [medline]
PHST- 2018/06/01 00:00 [pmc-release]
AID - 18736 [pii]
AID - 10.4274/tjod.57255 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;15(2):75-79. doi: 10.4274/tjod.57255. Epub 2018 
      Jun 21.